SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151172Can we ban him instead?goingbroke-7/17/2007
151171<i> Who is Quincy </i> Quincy is the moderator of this thread. Justmanalagi-7/17/2007
151170To funny. What was the specific reason they stated when banning you?goingbroke-7/17/2007
151169Limtex's posts are more informative than those of his childish antagonists.seti-7/17/2007
151168I'll throw my support of the original Limtex as well-- I don't see any lpyslent-7/17/2007
151167The board needs Limtex' perspectives, right or wrong. If he is not reinstatArt Bechhoefer-7/17/2007
151166YES GET HIM BACK! e.k.edwin k.-7/17/2007
151165DOW breaks record - 14,000! QCOM still in the 40's. I am not happy. www.Wggamer-7/17/2007
151164Limtex is a scholar and a gentleman (if he is indeed a guy). GET HIM BACK ! JonJon Koplik-7/17/2007
151163Again... agree.t_boy-7/17/2007
151162If anything, I found that the posts whining about Limtex were much more anoying goingbroke-7/17/2007
151161I also agree JimJim Fleming-7/17/2007
151160No ban. Especially not on this board.LarsA-7/17/2007
151159<i>Just found out that Limtex has been banned. Don't understand the rebdog-7/17/2007
151158Maybe Bush will pardon him eomjazzcat2000-7/17/2007
151157WHo decides who gets banned here anyway?goingbroke-7/17/2007
151156For the record, I agree. Limtex should not have been banned.Glider05-7/17/2007
151155Limtex has contributed a lot to qcom boards throughout the years if frustrated uJohn Carragher-7/17/2007
151154Absolutely agree. Limtex should not be banned. Those who find him difficult tocarranza2-7/17/2007
151153Agree.t_boy-7/17/2007
151152I second the request to have Limtex reinstated. What good is a message board if goingbroke-7/17/2007
151151Just found out that Limtex has been banned. Don't understand the reasoning. manalagi-7/17/2007
151150<i>the Federal Court of Appeals could rule on the stay at any moment</iDash of Reality-7/17/2007
151149HF: Most options expire worthless, and it seems that the market tries to pin imanalagi-7/17/2007
151148BRCM and NOK up to add insult to injurymindykoeppel-7/17/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News