SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151247Damn..I was just kidding...and the stock is tanking now..below 44.....No more Ligoingbroke-7/19/2007
151246Got Spinco?golfinvestor-7/19/2007
151245Probably won't hold 44 -- right on!Ken R-7/19/2007
151244Did you borrow Limtex's crystal ball?manalagi-7/19/2007
151243<i> "probably won't hold 44" </i> well spokenseti-7/19/2007
151242WHERE is limtex's commentary (when we all need it) ?Jon Koplik-7/19/2007
151241Broadcom OKs Verizon Wireless Imports Thursday July 19, 3:02 pm ET Broadcom inJohn Hayman-7/19/2007
151240I'll pick up where Lim left off. Here's the daily comment. "Qrap ugoingbroke-7/19/2007
151239Hi Jon, Yes, we remember the good old days. Maybe we met at the luncheon - formanalagi-7/19/2007
151238More >>> bring limtex back - analysis .................................Jon Koplik-7/19/2007
151237Wonder what other myths are out there.... The EU puts all companies on an even The Reaper-7/19/2007
151236yeah, I never believed in the cell phone tower stuff. All they had to to do was LarsA-7/19/2007
151235Disappearing Bees (replacing cell phone tower radiation theory with the parasiterobcomptec-7/19/2007
151234You are a respected board member and every one on this board is a respected memmanalagi-7/19/2007
151233What about us un-respected members? Lack of respect should not completely discot_boy-7/19/2007
151232wonderful.............Ruffian-7/19/2007
151231Thomas Weisel Partners Reiterates Qualcomm At Overweight With $55 Price Target benhorseman-7/19/2007
151230Posted this on other thread, it may be more relevant here. This may get the stAnother John-7/19/2007
151229(I'm not even sure what was the crime that Limtex committed.) i understand John Carragher-7/19/2007
151228I feel like Verizon or Sprint must have felt after the ITC dropped the hammer onpyslent-7/19/2007
151227do we have enough to stop this filibuster, do we have a quorum? Lim still suspeJohn Carragher-7/19/2007
151226Aren't you supposed to have only 5 free posts for being too cheap to pay formanalagi-7/19/2007
151225Let's just ban every member who asks for Limtex reinstatement. The list incmanalagi-7/19/2007
151224Quincy, please ban PlanetSurf for using the word kvetching and writing "nauMaurice Winn-7/19/2007
151223you still have the option not to read the detailJohn Carragher-7/19/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News