SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151297For Limtex: Qrap going hunting for truffles again. It wants the $30s. EveryonMaurice Winn-7/19/2007
151296Mq, "Good point, it's $6 per patent" I guess that's were we LarsA-7/19/2007
151295Who knows. I don't think it makes any difference.carranza2-7/19/2007
151294They made no mention of their request for a stay. Strategic, or an oversight?jackmore-7/19/2007
151293The Q PR is dead on perfect. It strikes exactly the right tone. Very professiocarranza2-7/19/2007
151292QUALCOMM Views Verizon Wireless' Agreement with Broadcom as Positive DevelopDaYooper-7/19/2007
151291Good point, it's $6 per patent. For QCOM's patent wall, that should addMaurice Winn-7/19/2007
151290Of course, no license to BRCM. And no ability, legally, for BRCM to sell chips.carranza2-7/19/2007
151289C2 that occurred to me also: Message 23716639 but it doesn't give Broadcom LarsA-7/19/2007
151288Okay, but those aren't "breaches the laws of physics" patents, forMaurice Winn-7/19/2007
151287I wonder if it is possible that Q is somehow participating in the payment by VZ carranza2-7/19/2007
151286<i>There is a cap on the maximum Verizon payment, no cap on brcm's offkech-7/19/2007
151285EricL, have you already broken open a special bottle of Cabernet or perhaps a smhedgefund-7/19/2007
151284Wow, Broadcom really knows how to play the game; the deal with VZ, described as hedgefund-7/19/2007
151283EricL's typical smartass remark(s) ... << I asked this on the other bEric L-7/19/2007
151282Some body please let this poor guy John Shinal(author) know how stupid his presuGO*QCOM-7/19/2007
151281<i> Bill Davidson, Qualcomm senior vice president for marketing and investseti-7/19/2007
151280The $6 was only for the '983 patent.... broadcom.com <i>Broadcom hasslacker711-7/19/2007
151279I agree, headline effect. Nonetheless, with VZW paying $6, it seems that BRCM carranza2-7/19/2007
151278i figured brcm ran out of money digging tunnels for ex partner. now they need moJohn Carragher-7/19/2007
151277I remember $6/per phone but I thought the total cost was in the billions....HFhedgefund-7/19/2007
151276One thing this should lay to rest is the NOK/BRCM et. al European complaint agaiThe Reaper-7/19/2007
151275Message 23716693John Carragher-7/19/2007
151274<i>Qualcomm's response: Qualcomm says still pursuing veto, stay on ITCpyslent-7/19/2007
151273This might get me banned, Beverly Hillbillies theme. A subject you guys should dcarranza2-7/19/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News