SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151472to me it is, U, well that is Ur story............just posting the facts, CAN U HRuffian-7/27/2007
151471Again, BFD.golfinvestor-7/27/2007
151470Qualcomm CTO Exercises Options Friday July 27, 11:31 am ET Qualcomm Chief TechnoRuffian-7/27/2007
151469Anybody notice the anemic volume being traded in Qual since 10:23? Only 2000 shapeterk-7/27/2007
151468Judge Mulls Qualcomm Penalties Thursday July 26, 10:50 pm ET By Elliot Spagat, John Hayman-7/27/2007
151467Keith re rates "Spreads and prices can stabilize and go back to normal&quoJim Fleming-7/26/2007
151466>>I'm getting ready to jump back in the stock for the end of the year BDAZZ-7/26/2007
151465>>Something is not right.<< Thanks Pete. I happened to be watching BDAZZ-7/26/2007
151464This "meltdown" in the corporate bond market is really without merit. Keith Feral-7/26/2007
151463Adding more fuel to the fire: Midnight Trader 6:15 p.m. 07/26/2007 Boston,peterk-7/26/2007
151462Yes. He are the trades at the close: 16:00:00 vol. 4200 @42.45 16:00:01 to :04 peterk-7/26/2007
151461>>Q even for the day<< This is what I also saw initially but the prBDAZZ-7/26/2007
151460You may be right. At any rate, we held up rather well today, all things considerTCGNJ-7/26/2007
151459<i>Or, maybe there is beginning to be a feeling out there that Q might be slacker711-7/26/2007
151458That's true in the short term but if treasuries continue to appreciate lendipeterk-7/26/2007
151457Yes, maybe the first bit of validation that earnings do matter.... Or, maybe thTCGNJ-7/26/2007
151456Nasdaq down 48....Q even for the day. I'll take it :-). Slackerslacker711-7/26/2007
151455Maybe someone one this board will think this is worthy of consideration: Is thinoj-7/26/2007
151454Peter, most of the time, that would be the case. However, the bonds are going uKeith Feral-7/26/2007
151453Market has greater concerns at this moment than Qual. however if Treasuries contpeterk-7/26/2007
151452The market wants more reassurances on the legal front. Earnings aren't cuttiTCGNJ-7/26/2007
151451Does anyone have the shedule of court decisions about to be rendered. I thoughtmindykoeppel-7/26/2007
151450Does anyone have the shedule of court decisions about to be rendered. I thoughtmindykoeppel-7/26/2007
151449That's the trouble with Qualcomm. They are damned if they do and damned if mindykoeppel-7/26/2007
151448How in God's name is it possible for QCOM to open DOWN after such outstandinblimfark-7/26/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News