SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1516 Jeez, all this MM talk smells of conspiracy. The market makers are there to facNero-1/28/1998
1515 >> They are NOT taking any shares here.<< Of course they are. WhoMichael Anthony-1/28/1998
1514 I dissagree. I do not see the mm's taking any shares; period. SSparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1513 Michael: honestly, it looks as if the mm's are simply standing aside. TheySparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1512 Mark Barger: Thanks for your ECO / DBCO report from the Yahoo board. The totDuncan-1/27/1998
1511 I agree. If all the stock was sold at the bid, it would be a sign that the MMs david james-1/27/1998
1510 >>almost all shares came in on the bid.<< MM's buy stock from Michael Anthony-1/27/1998
1509 Just pulled this off the Yahoo-ECGOF board. -----------------------------------MARK BARGER-1/27/1998
1508 Has anyone spoke with Cindy at IR lately? For some time her comments were quitEric O.-1/27/1998
1507 Michael: The mm's were accumulating the stock last week. This week they haSparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1506 I would like to put forth my thought that the MM's are possibly accommodatiMichael Anthony-1/27/1998
1505 >>Looks like either pre-earnings jitters, or bad news leaking out.<<Duncan-1/27/1998
1504 bought more at 9/16Sparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1503 Sparky, I appreciate your input. I agree ECGOF is certainly in a holding patteMARK BARGER-1/27/1998
1502 The uncertainty of the DBCO deal is likely to keep a lot of potential buyers ondavid james-1/27/1998
1501 >>Looks like either pre-earnings jitters, or bad news leaking out.<<Raymond James Norris-1/27/1998
1500 I have not seen one uptick yet. All 66K shs have come in on the bid. Now at 1/2Sparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1499 S&P up 1.5%...ECGOF down 1.7%. Like I said, it is going nowhere anytime soSparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1498 Eco just upgraded in First Call for full year 98. And no longer in "speciadavid james-1/27/1998
1497 Eco certainly isn't alone as an undervalued growing company on that list. INero-1/27/1998
1496 I bite, Sparky. Why is this explosive grower stuck at what soon will be a P/E MARK BARGER-1/27/1998
1495 #48 ? This one is going nowhere anytime soon. 2pt. trading range for the foresSparky Beardslee-1/27/1998
1494 Looks like Eco made it onto the list of the top 200 fastest growing companies adavid james-1/26/1998
1493 So far it looks like DBCO tried to bluff that there was another company willingdavid james-1/26/1998
1492 With DBCO ECO seems to be concentrating its interests in special construction sTemujin-1/26/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News