SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151672Glider05 <i>Even if NOK were to lose every legal contest to Q, they couldthinkclear-8/24/2007
151671QCOM's ability to assert their GSM/EDGE IP is what could possibly force NOK thinkclear-8/24/2007
151670<i>Even if NOK were to lose every legal contest to Q, they could still renGlider05-8/24/2007
151669I thought that a portion of the litigation regarded GSM/Edge IP that was never iDash of Reality-8/24/2007
151668Nokia share price at risk due to litigation with QCOM DoR Even if NOK were to thinkclear-8/24/2007
151667imho Eric talks, like a politician, with the bullshit let out of him............Ruffian-8/24/2007
151666<<<i>Nokia is a vicious competitor. Some years ago many thought theyscratchmyback-8/24/2007
151665why would U even post that? is he part of the Taliban? in Ur opinion?Ruffian-8/24/2007
151664My blood pressure will be lower, too ...Jon Koplik-8/24/2007
151663<i> Don't you people all have Eric L on "ignore" ? </i>manalagi-8/24/2007
151662<i>I thought Nokia's share was at risk, invested accordingly and cost Dash of Reality-8/24/2007
151661Don't you people all have Eric L on "ignore" ?Jon Koplik-8/24/2007
151660UMTS??!!!! PK, I suppose I should have typed UMTS (WCDMA) for you, or perhapsEric L-8/24/2007
151659UMTS??!!!! Nice Eric, keep living the dream of the Hagfish contingent.peterk-8/24/2007
151658GSMA's “3G for All” Initiative PK, << Neither did you respond to EurEric L-8/24/2007
151657<i> Like I said in my last post, I thought Nokia's share was at risk, seti-8/24/2007
151656Slacker I just wanted to chime in and say that haveing read this board diligentltripperd2-8/24/2007
151655<b>GSMA’s Selection of LG’s Handset for “3G for All” Initiative Will Accepeterk-8/24/2007
151654The funniest thing about all of these exchanges I have on Nokia is that I just cslacker711-8/24/2007
151653<i>However, you still did not respond to Eric and Nok claim that cdma was slacker711-8/24/2007
151652<i> You seriously dont understand a damn thing about Nokia </i> Eatseti-8/24/2007
151651QUALCOMM's RFP Award in Europe PK, << Neither did you respond to EurEric L-8/24/2007
151650Slacker- nice dancing, you should try out for that reality show. However, you stpeterk-8/24/2007
151649"on the earth" - I love that qualification. Sorry, this should be a PGlider05-8/24/2007
151648<I>Who will be, on the earth, the more aggressive second source?</i>slacker711-8/23/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):