SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151747Good point. I keep waiting for an entry point back into QCOM, and the news doesKeith Feral-9/12/2007
151746Good points, Art. Gold has been outperforming everything lately. With the dollKeith Feral-9/12/2007
151745Q closed at 38.50 with fairly good volume in AHpeterk-9/12/2007
151744<i> However, if that is the remedy, why should NOK be allowed to be verticseti-9/12/2007
151743Updated: September 11 2007 Qualcomm Inc. - September 2007 Call Options - Buy AAOpeter67-9/12/2007
151742the losses in the lawsuits are starting to hurt as customers are not confident fJGoren-9/12/2007
151741Keith--Dead money for the fourth (calendar) quarter? That's a conclusion I Art Bechhoefer-9/12/2007
151740online.barrons.com I guess it's dead money for the 4th quarter rally.Keith Feral-9/12/2007
151739I agree. Later in the day Q traded at .88 when the b/a was .95/.96peterk-9/11/2007
151738If you see a "dumb" "print," immediately check the bid / askJon Koplik-9/11/2007
151737Actually 37.81, however many of my associates saw the 45.30 earlier this morningpeterk-9/11/2007
151736need Ur eyes checked, 37.62 high, so far.Ruffian-9/11/2007
151735Ruff- I must have missed it but my screen shows Qual. hit a high of 45.30 this mpeterk-9/11/2007
151734Eriq, what you really mean is that Nokia was beaten by competitors. The euphemMaurice Winn-9/11/2007
151733No, a Ronald Reagan Rep. You like Larry. I guess you do since it's the firstpeterk-9/9/2007
151732ROTFLMFAO!Ruffian-9/9/2007
151731Are you a Larry Craig republican?Peter J Hudson-9/9/2007
151730Republican all the way!!!! Is there anything else worth being!!!peterk-9/9/2007
151729i lean towards McCarthyism, and U?Ruffian-9/9/2007
151728Ruff-Considering your response regarding Qual.'s legal problems and implyingpeterk-9/9/2007
151727get it right, extreme Liberals believe that...........engineer.Ruffian-9/8/2007
151726Ruff- Using the logic that it's Qual's fault for the lawsuits and litigapeterk-9/8/2007
151725like selling indulgences during the Inquisition.........Ruffian-9/8/2007
151724Not corruption at all. But somewhat of a huckster and a pump artist. I'm sblimfark-9/8/2007
151723Al is laying low, with big MaMa, after his son thought, (with help from all kindRuffian-9/8/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):