SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Loewen Group
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
277 8 0 LWN
Emcee:  thomas todd bishop Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
152 Steve: the stock still has a long way to go to $0.00 It is going there, just aMF-4/17/1999
151 I am not debating or refuting your opinion, only stating a fact that the statemSteve Johnston-4/17/1999
150 Steve, <i> ..this is, nevertheless, old news. In otherwords, it should Michael Bidder-4/17/1999
149 Although a bad article, this is, nevertheless, old news. In otherwords, it shoSteve Johnston-4/17/1999
148 Globe says Loewen admits bankruptcy possible LoMF-4/16/1999
147 MF, Although the road may be bumpy their is still some satisfaction left watchMichael Bidder-4/12/1999
146 This board is as dead as the company will be. For the record...... I covered MF-4/12/1999
145 I think you two are full of bull. Loewen is selling it's revenue to stay Michael Bidder-4/3/1999
144 Got it, you're saying that even in worst case, bondholders would get paid. Glen Gordon-4/3/1999
143 Glen, I don't think my analysis is contradictory. I attempted to break dowDemetre Deliyanakis-4/3/1999
142 I like reading posts that contradict themselves. First you said that these proGlen Gordon-4/2/1999
141 Daniel It is good to have you on the board.Your analysis is helpful to this siDemetre Deliyanakis-4/2/1999
140 FOCUS-Loewen posts big loss a day after bank deal (Updates throughout with earnMF-4/1/1999
139 Steve: Sorry but I'm unable to elaborate at this time. Not because I can&#William Whitehead Jr.-4/1/1999
138 Daniel: Well done on your short & thanks for your time analyzing the financMF-4/1/1999
137 Hi Demetre, Michael What do you mean by "NRV"? <i>The NRV for Daniel Chisholm-4/1/1999
136 Hi William, The reason I'm "digging through Loewen's old garbage&Daniel Chisholm-4/1/1999
135 The liquidation value analysis done by Daniel is conservative. It does not takDemetre Deliyanakis-4/1/1999
134 Daniel, Thank you for that fair analysis. The red will really start to flow nMichael Bidder-4/1/1999
133 I like the generalized optimism on your last two posts, however, please provideSteve Johnston-3/31/1999
132 I love you guys you will spend an eternity analysising the past and digging thrWilliam Whitehead Jr.-3/31/1999
131 Don't take the $608M loss at face value. Let's dig a little. First, tDaniel Chisholm-3/31/1999
130 This stock should be trading in the negative numbers! I am astounded at the loMichael Bidder-3/31/1999
129 Loss of $8.22 a share. Wasn't the book value $18.31 previously? So does thaJack-3/31/1999
128 4th Quarter biz.yahoo.com <i>...There is substantial doubt about the apMichael Bidder-3/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News