SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ultra OTC Fund - UOPIX
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2063 27 0 UOPIX
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1538Hi mjfdl, UOPIX and USPIX aren't inherently evil, but the can help you loseTodd Reichardt-5/9/2001
1537Hi, Life is good is correct! You would be well advised to follow his advice. IBernie Goldberg-5/9/2001
1536How's that for an investment strategy? No I don't buy your premise.But tmistermj-5/9/2001
1535Hi Bud, Either Woody read Lichello's book or Lichello hear the interview witBernie Goldberg-5/9/2001
1534<i>Start with equal dollar amounts of UOPIX/USPIX.Lets say $50,000 in eachlifeisgood-5/9/2001
1533UOPIX/USPIX as a self adjusting trading vehicle I would appreciate any comments mistermj-5/9/2001
1532Hi John, That Creamer guy had an article about 6 months ago showing he didn'Todd Reichardt-5/9/2001
1531Hi Barry, <i>To compare the return on UOPIX to the return on the NASDAC oJohn-5/9/2001
1530Hi Todd; Ahhh......I see the error of my thinking....your explanation was verybudweeder-5/9/2001
1529Hi Bernie; Thanks to you and other posters I am finally understanding the "budweeder-5/9/2001
1528Hi John, You wrote: <B> a fund such as UOPIX often substantially outperfolabestul-5/9/2001
1527Hi Bud, because the compounding means you are raising the 1X and 2X to some powTodd Reichardt-5/9/2001
1526Hi Bud, Rather than talking about any fund, IMO the discussion should be limitedBernie Goldberg-5/9/2001
1525Hi Bob; I can see that you are right from my own experience in the RYVYX fund. budweeder-5/9/2001
1524Bud, I think, loosely speaking, that you will find if NDX hasa to climb 100% tobob wallace-5/9/2001
1523Hi Bernie and all who are commenting on the UOPIX movements....sorry for a slow budweeder-5/9/2001
1522well, I am sure since it was you and not me that decided to go short, all will wbob wallace-5/9/2001
1521Hi Bob, I went 100% short in USPIX at the close yesterday. I will evaluate my John-5/9/2001
1520Bernie wrote: <i>They prove that no matter how you slice it UOPIX is a moJohn-5/8/2001
1519That's a great example, Barry, and absolutely correct. Without question, leJohn-5/8/2001
1518Hi Barry, All of the examples that both you and life is good are creating are noBernie Goldberg-5/8/2001
1517Here is another example: The NASDAQ is at 1,000 and UOPIX is at 100 at the end labestul-5/8/2001
1516Lifeisgood wrote: <I> volatility is UOPIX biggest enemy </I> This labestul-5/8/2001
1515Hi John, I don't think you will find that in any post, I have ever stated thBernie Goldberg-5/8/2001
1514<<<It's reasonably simple to determine whether the market is in a sTodd Reichardt-5/8/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News