SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
i2 Technologies
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2339 100 0 ITWO
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1539 It would have to go deep into negative dollars for me to lose! Best, LoDSecularBull-1/14/2000
1538 that was wise, now you can not possibly lose on itwo, even if it goes to zero. Charles P. Hubbard-1/14/2000
1537 Sold 1/3rd at $160 to hedge (tripled my total investment in all shares). HoldiSecularBull-1/14/2000
1536 Congats on getting in at $18: I wish I had. However, if I had I would at least Charles P. Hubbard-1/14/2000
1535 Charles, I know this market well enough that sometimes the fundamentals take soSecularBull-1/14/2000
1534 look at fundamentals like pe, revenues, revenue growth, market cap, etc, and deCharles P. Hubbard-1/14/2000
1533 you are right on, I agree. CPH Charles P. Hubbard-1/14/2000
1532 <i>Its all momentum investing and mindless speculation. </i> You cbrk-1/14/2000
1531 <<i>Did I misinterpret anything you said?<</i> No, that'WTSherman-1/14/2000
1530 <<i>Does this mean that ITWO should be viewed as a takeover target by WTSherman-1/14/2000
1529 WT, I tend to agree with you. I too have been watching ITWO for a long while abrk-1/13/2000
1528 Thanks for the clarification. Certainly helps me understand where you're coHN-1/13/2000
1527 <<i>So, please clarify something. When you talk of "larger" WTSherman-1/13/2000
1526 Why do you think that? Thanks. LoDSecularBull-1/13/2000
1525 Why? Thanks. LoDSecularBull-1/13/2000
1524 Thanks wizard. Do you have anything like a price target for ITWO in the next yeHN-1/13/2000
1523 The companies you list are all ecommerce-focused. Software companies are the fWizard-1/13/2000
1522 Thank You HN.....if ITWO is way overvalued, then what do these people have to sbrk-1/13/2000
1521 ITWO's recent raise in valuation came about when it began to be seen as a pHN-1/13/2000
1520 <<i>I agree, the valuation of ITWO is insane. <</i> What'WTSherman-1/13/2000
1519 Is your interest in the stock purely as a trader? If not, what exactly about thHN-1/13/2000
1518 i have been both long and short in itwo. at the present (since $173), i am longCharles P. Hubbard-1/13/2000
1517 Would you mind stating exactly what your position is/has been in ITWO? Short? LHN-1/13/2000
1516 I agree, the valuation of ITWO is insane. Charles P. Hubbard-1/13/2000
1515 No need for a split. ITWO will be $75/share in another month or so... This haWTSherman-1/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News