SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Anvil Resources (V.ANV)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2214 8 0 ANV
Emcee:  I_C_Deadpeople Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1539 You know Alan, I can't even be bothered to read most of your posts. I get aAL Berta-7/11/1998
1538 Yeah big Al took a knife to a gunfight! Alan Brezin-7/11/1998
1537 And we read here from your ad nauseum scare mongering which is the other side oAlan Brezin-7/11/1998
1536 And DYOLF is willing and able to buy back their own shares to increase their veAlan Brezin-7/11/1998
1535 Said Al:<<Oh well, as they say Maybe Monday.>> Right on Al, maybe Alan Brezin-7/10/1998
1534 In fact, during the decline of WT the RSI was neutral and has stayed neutral alAL Berta-7/10/1998
1533 If reading indicators were an exact science then this business of making money AL Berta-7/10/1998
1532 John: Unlike you, I have never twisted anyone's words to fit my purposes anAL Berta-7/10/1998
1531 P.S. AL' Rich Report recommended Anvil in late Feb. in the $.40 range. my pRich Report-7/10/1998
1530 I've made every attempt to stay away tonight because you're all fallingRich Report-7/10/1998
1529 AL, when looking at his selected T/A indicators that he has said he relies uponJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1528 AL, Once again you post your conjecture ... <b>PUMP & DUMP, PUMP &aJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1527 Al I agree with you that the TA and Fundamentals together can ' help tell PaulB-7/10/1998
1526 As usual, you are giving evasive responses and missing <i>the original poJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1525 John, I don't care to SPECULATE as to the result of the 2nd frac and it upsAL Berta-7/10/1998
1524 Obviously, you aren't reading those nice e-mails they are sending you everyAL Berta-7/10/1998
1523 <b>Wrong!</b> The answer should not be "Will Labatt's neJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1522 PaulB: As you are probably starting to gather, the technicals are a nice tool bAL Berta-7/10/1998
1521 AL said ... <b>"Perhaps too, the rallying of the guard from CannaccJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1520 So AL can you explain to me why your view of TA and that of William ShakespearePaulB-7/10/1998
1519 Ask questions that make sense JW. As for whether I "think" the secondAL Berta-7/10/1998
1518 Total flow from second frac of 4mcft.would be fantastic.Open flow from both zonSAM-DAN-7/10/1998
1517 Actually, I bought twice. Once under a dollar and then again just above. AccorAL Berta-7/10/1998
1516 AL, In post #1508 you said, <b>"See the thing is JW, ask me my honeJohn Walker-7/10/1998
1515 Sam, what number would YOU like to see come forth as the result of this next frchalk-7/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):