SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece
An SI Board Since June 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2772 10 0
Emcee:  redfish Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1547That's an emotion that normally adjusted people shouldn't feel. If an anBill-7/1/2004
1546<B>ATTENTION THREAD</B> If you want an open discussion about Moore, Bill-7/1/2004
1545It has nothing to do with censorship. I just dislike you as a person.redfish-7/1/2004
1544What the liberals say: Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in YugoslaviBill-7/1/2004
1543This is how lefties deal with the truth. Censor and hide. You are a credit to yBill-7/1/2004
1542Thank you, Brian. Apologies are few and far between here on SI. That was nice exdaytrader76-7/1/2004
1541On the Arab street, I haven't seen a poll but perhaps Saddam is a hero to soAmerican Spirit-7/1/2004
1540You have serious issues, buster.Bill-7/1/2004
1539I've had trouble moderating you off this board, for some reason attributableredfish-7/1/2004
1538<i>but to those on the Arab street he might even be turning into a hero<Proud_Infidel-7/1/2004
1537Okay, sorry. You do not appear to be a political hack. My apologies, as most hProud_Infidel-7/1/2004
1536Well, I'm more interested in how people "read" things. For instancKenya AA-7/1/2004
1535This Saddam trial is embarrassing to Bush. Saddam was supposed to be crazy and oAmerican Spirit-7/1/2004
1534<i>Oh, that's right, it doesn't fit your agenda.</i> I haveexdaytrader76-7/1/2004
1533Meet me at the great pool there! JaneJane4IceCream-7/1/2004
1532If these were the final arguments of a prosecutor, he'd be in very, very deecosmicforce-7/1/2004
1531If you want to play a pure numbers game, then why not state the fact that approxProud_Infidel-7/1/2004
1530Saddam was killing 5000 a week, so the Iraqis are way ahead, go Bushlongnshort-7/1/2004
1529With about 10,000 civilian dead alone, more than half of that number should be wexdaytrader76-7/1/2004
1528can i come? <G>Brasco One-7/1/2004
1527Richard Clark has said the movie is filled with lieslongnshort-7/1/2004
1526X feels herself obliged to preach what she can’t practice.average joe-7/1/2004
1525<i>It only diminishes the patronizer. </i> That is, of course, if tBill-7/1/2004
1524I think Hitchens appears a bit frantic in that piece. Might he be one of the laPoet-7/1/2004
1523<I>Arguments cannot be won by patronizing. </I> Quite right. It onPoet-7/1/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):