SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Theragenics on the NYSE (TGX)
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
305 4 0 TGX
Emcee:  dfloydr Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
155 I bought my first shares of TGX a couple of years ago after doing DD. I was seeWally-2/6/1999
154 I am quite sure the legal skirmishing is meaningless. The only specific mentiondfloydr-2/5/1999
153 <i>I have to wonder if all these lawsuits are in the shareholders best inJim Roof-2/5/1999
152 TGX is being sued by everyone and their uncle. I think we found a floor. If wSam2482-2/5/1999
151 Your points are well stated and noted. Having said that, the Company has quitTim Cruise-2/5/1999
150 I checked with my brother the urologist. Animals by themselves do not have whatdfloydr-2/4/1999
149 Any further response on the use of animals in prostrate testing? I am interestTim Cruise-2/4/1999
148 Insider Charlie Klimkowski, Director bought 45,000 shares 1/11 to 1/15 at priceRobert DeHaven-2/3/1999
147 I thought one of the problems for prostate research is that there are no animaldfloydr-2/2/1999
146 I have been lurking around here for a while. I thought that a couple of you guTim Cruise-2/2/1999
145 Hmm... perhaps good news from a good source ... The Mayo. The Journal of Urolodfloydr-2/1/1999
144 Jim, I picked up 1.2 Mil. I don't know who took the other 200,000. Yeah rDr.Hamma-2/1/1999
143 Now to speculate on who absorbed that block. Another institution? Maybe a smJim Roof-1/31/1999
142 MM46, D Floyd could be right, it was probably an institution dumping TGX so thDr.Hamma-1/31/1999
141 Looks to me like an institution bailing out that was not smart enough to sell adfloydr-1/31/1999
140 thought the 1.34mm block at 6.25 was an interesting print.your thoughts would bMktMkr46-1/31/1999
139 Seasonality... I have been involved with TGX since 1991, and TGX used to say thbill hopkins-1/30/1999
138 I wouldn't be surprised if the buyer was the TGX specialist. If there was aTed Zeilstra-1/29/1999
137 It would be interesting to know who that seller was. I find it hard to believe dfloydr-1/28/1999
136 Jim, There is a news release out now, but it only says that CJ joined the boaDr.Hamma-1/28/1999
135 Another question might also be "Who bought the 1M plus shares?". TheJim Roof-1/28/1999
134 Well I may be wrong about a news leak. I just went to Excite and looked at an Dr.Hamma-1/28/1999
133 Well today turned out to be a disappointment. I wonder who dumped the 1M plus Dr.Hamma-1/28/1999
132 TGX just broke ground on another cyclotron bay. This one comes fresh on the heJim Roof-1/28/1999
131 stock will soon gather attention via value/growth screens, hang on!! rocky haag-1/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News