SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Francisco Gold - FGX.V
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1907 23 0 FGX
Emcee:  tom terry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1557You may be right but I've followed this for awhile now and there's been Elizabeth Andrews-1/18/2002
1556OT : Newmont chief sees gold rising by $25-$50 an ounce Friday January 18, 2:21Paul-D-1/18/2002
1555This is a little devils advocacy here, Personally I don't think that tradinFishfinder-1/18/2002
1554I agree. Something's up. There's one thing for sure, they haven't beElizabeth Andrews-1/18/2002
1553Well Gold going up does help FGX but not to the degree I thnk I am seeing. Don&#TheBusDriver-1/18/2002
1552Could it be the price of gold and the fact that the Yen is tanking rather than sCage Rattler-1/17/2002
1551Hi Wayne, I have no concerns about FGX moving up regardless of the POG. It isgold$10k-1/17/2002
1550Hey VT look at this: askresearch.com As you know I don't know about those TheBusDriver-1/17/2002
1549I just get the feeling something is up with FGX. Very stong Bid now at 6.90 and TheBusDriver-1/17/2002
1548Good action in Francisco todaymarynell-1/10/2002
1547Paul, Any day! Any weeks! ClaudeClaude Cormier-1/9/2002
1546Claude, When do you think FGX might release their latest drilling results ? ThPaul-D-1/9/2002
1545Well the low on the Canadian Exchnage was $6.46 or $4.06US So guess your broker Claude Cormier-1/3/2002
1544Something odd, but pleasant happened for me on FGX today. Well actually it was Jon Matz-1/3/2002
1543Eliz, I agree that the main problem is topography. But I don't think it is Claude Cormier-12/26/2001
1542The main problem at El Sauzal is with the topography as there are no easy and inElizabeth Andrews-12/26/2001
1541Russ, I have a conservative value of EL Sauzal at very near $C8 based on currenClaude Cormier-12/25/2001
1540Message 16262610Bruce Robbins-12/25/2001
1539Russ, Jim Steele had a posting somewhere on SI on why he didn't think El Sualoantech-12/25/2001
1538What are you using for ounces? There are 2.03 million in the oxide reserve with russwinter-12/25/2001
1537Eliz, <If the mining and milling costs are in the $90 per ounce range and ifClaude Cormier-12/18/2001
1536If the mining and milling costs are in the $90 per ounce range and if the capex Elizabeth Andrews-12/17/2001
1535My goodness, Marynell! The thought of sleeping with my FGX certificates hadn'Elizabeth Andrews-12/15/2001
1534"FGX moving ahead!" Remember: El Sauzal is usually quoted as about 1.marynell-12/15/2001
1533Lot of stuff in there that I don't understand but 95% recovery looks pretty TheBusDriver-12/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News