SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
5spl
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2534 28 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1559A more interesting question, perhaps....what if the shop owner likes to sell to Dale Baker-7/12/2004
1558<i>[H]ow would the store owner know the perpetrator was only engaging in &LPS5-7/12/2004
1557He didn't go far enough. If he had worn a parka and ski boots, they would noWaveSeeker-7/12/2004
1556I knew about the use against political groups and businesses. I'm surprisedTimF-7/11/2004
1555Here's a quote from www.ricoact.com: "Today, RICO is almost never applDominick-7/11/2004
1554So if you commit a mail or wire fraud all by yourself you can face a charge undeTimF-7/11/2004
1553<i>some sort of organization or alleged conspiracy.</i> You would tDominick-7/11/2004
1552I knew that the RICO act being twisted but I didn't know it had been twistedTimF-7/11/2004
1551<i>You would be guilty of the charge of reckless driving even though you dDominick-7/10/2004
1550I could see it as threatening behavior, I just don't see any threatening behTimF-7/10/2004
1549I don't think that anything that scares someone else, even if done intentionTimF-7/10/2004
1548<i>if you feel protecting the right of mask-wearers libertarians in storesLibbyt-7/9/2004
1547<i>But he didn't "make a terrorist threat</i> and again...MulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1546You could eliminate a lot of indecision by doing it the Italian way.......everybDominick-7/9/2004
1545<i> and what if he doesn't take off the ski mask? </i> Tell hTimF-7/9/2004
1544<i>You don't have a right to blow someone away for walking around in aMulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1543<i> you are arguing that it is up to the state to *not* prohibit this guyTimF-7/9/2004
1542honestly t, i don't think it matters whether we agree he is a jerk or not...MulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1541We agree that he is a jerk, but apparently on this issue that's about all weTimF-7/9/2004
1540<i>If he did nothing more then wear the mask in the store it would be the MulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1539<i> no, he was putting more than *his* life at risk... he was putting theTimF-7/9/2004
1538<i>I do think he was putting his life at risk, </i> no, he was puttMulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1537I guess that we will just have to disagree on this one. I don't think he deTimF-7/9/2004
1536<i>If he didn't do anything but walk around with the ski mask I donMulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
1535:) yes...MulhollandDrive-7/9/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):