SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
159 Good advice Tim, But I think im sexually involved with my stock, thBottom Feeder-2/27/1997
158 Positive article on the merger: sfgate.com Speculation on CSCO outbidding COMying-2/27/1997
157 You were planning to visit Shiva. Any news?I Goldstein-2/27/1997
156 Greg, having a little time to digest the merger, a little common sense may be iRamsey Su-2/27/1997
155 "S&P may up 3Com Corp corporate credit rating" (Press release isGreg Jung-2/27/1997
154 David, yes I'm calm, but I'm confused about the deal. I certainly see sunny-2/27/1997
153 Actuallly, I agree with you that BAY is still a serious player in the networkinThomas Kiser-2/27/1997
152 I'm sorry that source is one I cannot respect. Microsoft in the businessGreg Jung-2/27/1997
151 It seems every one including networking companies and investors are confused abeDollar.com-2/27/1997
150 Sunny, stay calm and let the dust settle, especially if you are long shares. ItDavid Lawrence-2/27/1997
149 I invest for a living and it amazes me that the correpondents on this thread doJohn F. Dowd-2/27/1997
148 sunny: It's not a bad strategy... push hard to get x2 into as many ISP'bill c.-2/27/1997
147 Research Alert - Sherwood Research: 3Com/US Robotics Deal Issues, OpportunitiesAnthony-2/27/1997
146 Thanks David, exactly my thought. Anyway, can someone finally clear up my 20-hsunny-2/27/1997
145 I guess it's not ironic at all, because the article draws a very critical psunny-2/27/1997
144 Easily said. If you don't you must be an iceberg.DMaA-2/27/1997
143 <b> WHAAAAAAAAT???!!!</b> Please tell me that's not true! I casunny-2/27/1997
142 sunny, isn't it ironic? two wunderful companies merge together and the resuandreas fauler-2/27/1997
141 I just saw the report that says they will be supporting both tech's. SoundSteven Angelil-2/27/1997
140 Don't ever get emotionally involved with a stock. BIG MISTAKE!Tim Luke-2/27/1997
139 People were afraid the Motorola law suit would be distracting, I wonder how mucDMaA-2/27/1997
138 COMS president in interview just said merged company will support Rockwell modeAdrian Overstreet-2/27/1997
137 Maybe the correct way for us USRX longs to look at it is this- Take your USRX Steven Angelil-2/27/1997
136 Andreas, thanks for your link. I don't think the report is funny at all - bsunny-2/27/1997
135 Good thought. However, what are the chances of a major turnaround in Coms if tSteven Angelil-2/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):