SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
XOMA. Bull or Bear?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17367 72 0 XOMA
Emcee:  Olu Emuleomo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16017Angry at underperformance>yes. Added a little in 4s. Generally holding to 1/3Robert K.-8/31/2002
16016I am thinking lilly might find bpi21 more interesting than baxter currently doesRobert K.-8/31/2002
16015Robert, I agree but they need a partner to develop the BPI peptides. I have sugaknahow-8/30/2002
16014And I thought i was the only one that cared about bpi. So, cacaito you know my lRobert K.-8/30/2002
16013Check at Allp news, they are breaking with PFC (Baxter co venture with Allp) becCacaito-8/29/2002
16012Something wrong with a system where IF you get caught your only punishment is gLarryS-8/28/2002
16011Has anyone ever heard of a case of insider trading where the inside trader was nRobert K.-8/28/2002
16010Well George, in a sense, dna was involved in natural bpi from the get go. Thats Robert K.-8/28/2002
16009Larry, nice to see familiar faces too. Ah, baxter & neuprex. If it didnt worRobert K.-8/28/2002
16008Oops...thanks for the backup George. I have heard so little from BAX I almost fLarryS-8/28/2002
16007Finally an explanation that makes sense. BAX does not develop Neuprex because taknahow-8/27/2002
16006Good to hear from you again Robert K. I think you need to send your list to DNA,LarryS-8/27/2002
16005Would be even more interesting to pick up some of my old posts from compuserve oRobert K.-8/27/2002
16004Repost of my in-famous post 10,001. Do I STILL beleive it? ........here it is>Robert K.-8/27/2002
16003Come to think of it I also own post 1000 from 1997. I own a few other good ones Robert K.-8/27/2002
16002A Blast from the past....a repost of SI post 10,000 from 99. .............. RobeRobert K.-8/27/2002
16001I believe I have once again totally outmanuvered the infamous Mr GW. I have secuRobert K.-8/27/2002
16000Bluegreen,...........................lets play a game....... ..........the game Robert K.-8/27/2002
15999Robert S. you may be this boards self proclaimed sceptic but you are the one thaaknahow-8/25/2002
15998Interesting how some ignore the facts and glibly post that Xoma has failed at evaknahow-8/22/2002
15997Do you have any idea of why I loved the article you posted? You may be a self paknahow-8/22/2002
15996parking url. quotes.nasdaq.com`&selected=XOMAaknahow-8/21/2002
15995Cacaito, can you explain this???? ncbi.nlm.nih.govBluegreen-8/21/2002
15994Indeed, I loved the article you posted. ""Rather, such variables asaknahow-8/20/2002
15993George, as I am this board's self-proclaimed resident skeptic, one grows weaRobert S.-8/20/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):