SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EMC How high can it go?
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17183 357 0 EMC
Emcee:  Just4fun2 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16033BofA starts EMC with a Buy, NTAP with a Neutral : Banc of America initiates covejad-3/30/2004
16032Good for you--pirate! fredFred Levine-3/29/2004
16031> noted that Gus started his own EMC thread See: Subject 54657 It's &qupirate_200-3/28/2004
16030<i>>> it's just that I hate to see another stock thread turn intSI Dave-3/28/2004
16029gus come on back! ya hear!John Carragher-3/28/2004
16028I'll second that...please return oh noble sage!charlief-3/27/2004
16027Gus: If you're out there, I hope you're doing fine and hope you'll stpeter-3/27/2004
16026Press Release Source: EMC Corporation EMC Brings World of Advanced Networked SFred Levine-3/26/2004
16025Press Release Source: EMC Corporation EMC Centera Awarded Second Annual 'BFred Levine-3/24/2004
16024TP, Take that to a political thread! This thread is for EMC. Then again I wouldnJakeStraw-3/24/2004
16023I dont know, I got cash but frankly I am afraid what will happen if Kerry gets eJDN-3/24/2004
16022wish i had some lose cash. I think the market is ready to move with earnings comJohn Carragher-3/24/2004
16021I think what we really need is a booming stock market. THAT would get things baJDN-3/24/2004
16020maybe we need a moderated thread to stop the political nonsense when we got fiftJohn Carragher-3/24/2004
16019Me too. Maybe if we got down on our knees? jdnJDN-3/24/2004
16018GVTucker, although Gus had his abrasive side at times, he was our facts king andELH1006-3/24/2004
16017Fred you have been reported to the SI monitor and if you continue with the BS thSPSEIFERT-3/23/2004
16016<i>The economy is not Bush's fault, nor 9/11.</i> Of course not.TigerPaw-3/23/2004
16015Dear Dr. ID: While on the topic of Bush, etc. The world is waiting franticly forstpeter-3/23/2004
16014<i>I agree with you. That's why I only responded to Gus' polemics.Dr. Id-3/23/2004
16013Jake-->>Fred, That's fine. But with so many established political threFred Levine-3/23/2004
16012He contributed a lot to this thread and is missed. As an investor in emc i enjoyJohn Carragher-3/23/2004
16011Gus was a great credit to this thread. But he was completely unable to have a cGVTucker-3/23/2004
16010Fred, That's fine. But with so many established political threads why shouldJakeStraw-3/23/2004
16009When Gus, or anyone, states opinions, they are subject to good old democratic deFred Levine-3/23/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):