SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
London Pacific Group - LPGL doubles...
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
737 6 0 LPGL
Emcee:  Patherzen Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
162 <<a list of lpgly's private investments>> Excellent post, maveMSI-4/15/1999
161 4 posts in recent SI posting history, and all in LPGLY. By your own admission,EyeDrMike-4/15/1999
160 It's truly too bad you prefer the shadows. Thanks for the input. I'd still learning-4/15/1999
159 Maven, I for one thank you for the info. I would like to ask you some further qGoinlong-4/15/1999
158 xcr600: <i>Not positive on Naz rules, but since they are based in Jerseyrupert1-4/15/1999
157 I had to come back to respond to this one. Very funny, indeed. I love getting fmaven2010-4/15/1999
156 <i> Yet the change in accounting principles suggests it is preparixcr600-4/15/1999
155 maven2010: Thanks for your post. <i>"i find it interesting that norupert1-4/15/1999
154 Maven, The Security Exchange Laws in the U.S. must be followed if a Company, DwcOkla-4/15/1999
153 Maven's posts sure are interesting. I am having trouble putting together hJoseph Waligore-4/15/1999
152 I apologize for earlier comment. I now understand your view. Thanks for the cGoBulls-4/15/1999
151 my last post. . .back to the shadows netp is firm; robby stephens says it willmaven2010-4/15/1999
150 From NETG's latest s-1a 3/29/99 (btw, they aren't selling any in case xcr600-4/15/1999
149 Rajiv is correct. If you so desire, you can verify the numbers in the "PrGlenn Petersen-4/15/1999
148 You can easily verify the exact # of shares (of NETG and NETP) held by LPGLY byRajiv-4/15/1999
147 I'm curious as to why this company is referred to on the boards as being Brrupert1-4/15/1999
146 I saw a different set of #s -- which agreed with the 2.6 m shrs of NETP, but shstill learning-4/15/1999
145 Phew! Thanks. rupert1-4/15/1999
144 <i> There's a poster on the Yahoo Board (can't find the referenceRajiv-4/15/1999
143 There's a poster on the Yahoo Board (can't find the reference again) whrupert1-4/15/1999
142 Rampnetworks. <i> LEADING INTERNET ACCESS COMPANY RAMP NETWORKS SECURESxcr600-4/15/1999
141 Some info on AccessLan, an LPGLY holding. x <i> AccessLan was founded xcr600-4/15/1999
140 LPGLY,CMGI,WCAP all recovering from today's lowsmichel petit-4/15/1999
139 This posting on Yahoo Board - 1st April write-up: Lpgly write up.... by: DY_64rupert1-4/15/1999
138 out at 28 1/8, will wait to get back in eom. chFUZFO-4/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News