SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16229Amboy and Hal, Thanks. SFC.Swamp Fox-10/25/2004
16228For the sake of guessing for the fun of it... Nice volume. May go down for awhiHal Campbell-10/25/2004
16227Charlie, What happened to the public apology I posted? Susan sent me an email Amboy Charlie-10/25/2004
16226To the two Charlies. Microcaps are so inherently risky I wouldn't buy intHal Campbell-10/25/2004
16225Amboy - SONY - "nearing a finalized agreement" per lawyers. That is aSwamp Fox-10/25/2004
16224Charlie, No doubt you are right, but there's still a whole lot of overhead Amboy Charlie-10/25/2004
16223Amboy, falsehood? Geez, that hurts. Try this on. You pick up the phone and caSwamp Fox-10/25/2004
16222Amboy, everyone - caution is always the watchword. However, at this day, this vSwamp Fox-10/25/2004
16221This is a warning to those who would post any more falsehoods. I'm gonna cheAmboy Charlie-10/25/2004
16220Those of us who have bought the rumor in the past have seen a spike of 500% follAmboy Charlie-10/25/2004
16219Charlie, I am as humble as hades about all of my axc ....whoops aexca...misappreHal Campbell-10/25/2004
16218Well said, Hal. And most of the giddiness has been among the members of this bulAmboy Charlie-10/24/2004
16217Charlie, I hope you made a killing on this move. Thanks for hanging in and shariHal Campbell-10/24/2004
16216Cautions well taken, Charlie.Ampex has historically rewarded extreme bottom fishHal Campbell-10/24/2004
16215Dr.D. You may be right but who knows. Is that really what they are doing? Is tAmboy Charlie-10/24/2004
16214Thanks SFC, You are right on target as usual with your information, i.e. accuraDrD-10/24/2004
16213Amboy, I think it is an excellent strategy, to select the patent that is closesDrD-10/24/2004
16212Swamp Fox, nothing personal regarding what I said in my previous post. I don'Amboy Charlie-10/24/2004
16211Thanks, funtimes, for that link to the Ampex lawsuit, now if I could find that AAmboy Charlie-10/24/2004
16210Hope this helps... From the 10Q: Over the past two years, we have been in actiSwamp Fox-10/23/2004
16209funtimes, Thanks for the reply and the link. I subsequently found a source (froDrD-10/23/2004
16208This was post by a yahoo member who attended the stock holder meeting in June an1funtimes-10/23/2004
16207This was post by a yahoo member who attended the stock holder meeting in June an1funtimes-10/23/2004
16206I agree 100% Hal, Although I have not done a thorough examination of all the poDrD-10/23/2004
16205Thanks FT and Doc. So we need to know if any other ancillary patents are involveHal Campbell-10/23/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):