SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
3DFX
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
16960 43 0 TDFX
Emcee:  fiberman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16235 The goodwill, in-process R&D and such will not hit until the merger is compMichael G. Potter-4/22/2000
16234 If that sinking feeling feels bad, consider the alternative of 3dfx having nothObewon-4/22/2000
16233 So what do we have to look forward to for this quarter ... we have new in-proceJoe C.-4/22/2000
16232 But we were not talking about valuing the company, we were talking about valuinMichael G. Potter-4/22/2000
16231 Not exactly, Michael. While the asset approach that you described provides an Obewon-4/22/2000
16230 <i>Even though the first attempt of T&L in the GeForce may not be allScott Garee-4/22/2000
16229 Fair market value is determined by the assets the company owns. There are a buMichael G. Potter-4/21/2000
16228 Any guesses on what the goodwill will be? And how many quarters? Who determinPlaz-4/21/2000
16227 The valuation is the same from private companies. Goodwill is the "plug&qMichael G. Potter-4/21/2000
16226 If the drivers for V5 are rough, then where that would show up most is in the lPlaz-4/21/2000
16225 It doesn't surprise me that some Q3 benchmarks, especially is lower resolutMichael G. Potter-4/21/2000
16224 A day off is nice after the past week....Happy Easter everyone. DaveDave Bissett-4/21/2000
16223 ATI (and Matrox) were masters of the 2D realm. Both were caught off guard by tPlaz-4/21/2000
16222 Ironic, to me, since ATI used to have such a strong reputation for it's dribenwood-4/20/2000
16221 ATI has always had pretty solid chips, but they'll never be more than a cheMark099-4/20/2000
16220 375 Man Years put into ATI's upcoming Rage 6!!! Whoa... I wonder how many MJohn Farrell-4/20/2000
16219 <i>If the FSAA doesn't require any CPU cycles, then on slower processScott Garee-4/19/2000
16218 My thoughts on the benchmarks so far: 1) They were obviously rushed to get somMichael G. Potter-4/19/2000
16217 Beyond3D's review is with an overclocked 300a (I have one of those as well)Michael G. Potter-4/19/2000
16216 No revenue recognition until the product is shipped. The payments are just depMichael G. Potter-4/19/2000
16215 </lurk> I'm starting to get excited about this crop of accelerators. timbur-4/19/2000
16214 The numbers are great for a test board. I don't remember ever seeing a testJoe C.-4/19/2000
16213 <I>Anyone think performance will go up 40-50% with mature, tweaked driverGreg S.-4/19/2000
16212 Unfortunately, those benchmarks may have been in 16-bit color only. The previecpntrips-4/19/2000
16211 Yes...per their revenue recognition as revealed in their 10Q and 10K's, theObewon-4/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News