SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
IMP, Inc. (IMPX @ 7 1/8)A sympathy play with IOM??
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2560 2 0 IMPX
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1635 Ya know, those damn "big guys" just love to pressure the "inexpemarie fouchia-8/1/1996
1634 Mark....That was IOMG put 2 call ratio....but never mind,it's really not woSR/WA-7/31/1996
1633 Curtis...As fellow CANSLIM brothers of the cloth,we can empathize with the ineSR/WA-7/31/1996
1632 I was browsing Wall Street Online and one statement was made that stood out. TCurtis Frazier-7/31/1996
1631 Ken I would think they would have been purchased, because it was probably someoMark The Trader-7/31/1996
1630 25 contrs.,Oct. 25's,were sold yesterday on IMPX....Ain't that weird?..SR/WA-7/31/1996
1629 Price in a year ?? who knows :-}. If you have a long term view and can stomach Mark The Trader-7/31/1996
1628 The main reason for this stock to drop from the 52wk high was pretty much due tJ.T.-7/31/1996
1627 TO: Flowers I couldn't agree with you more about the sue issue. I'm a Bruce Liley-7/31/1996
1626 The management sure screwed the shareholders, but they didn't screw themselJ.T.-7/31/1996
1625 Good point....My point,which I did'nt make very well,is we are living N a lSR/WA-7/31/1996
1624 Bruce; i agree with you that management is responsible to the shareholders,Bill Perry-7/31/1996
1623 To: K.H. Flower Thanks for your message. I enjoy reading everyones view. I do Bruce Liley-7/31/1996
1622 Bruce:...Don't take offence at what I'm bout 2 say;Nobody held a gun atSR/WA-7/30/1996
1621 Ouch!!! I'm hurting. I'm in at 2000 sh @$12.00. I guess IMPX moves to tBruce Liley-7/30/1996
1620 The analyst who is lowering estimates is Gains Borland, he is going to 20 centsMark The Trader-7/30/1996
1619 More power to ya Mr K. I need to trade my way back - that's why I have thisKevin Walsh-7/30/1996
1618 Thanks for your comments and your insights, Judah. You've been right on witKevin Walsh-7/30/1996
1617 The "remark" directed 2 U was TOTALLY out of line and worse than crudSR/WA-7/29/1996
1616 Mark, the crude remark was not yours but someone else's. Sorry if I suggeshoodie-7/29/1996
1615 Judah, I am currently working for TI (Stafford, Texas.) I have not seeing any iTan Tran-7/29/1996
1614 That's tellin' 'em Mr. K. TanTan Tran-7/29/1996
1613 IMPX was never the sole supplier of the chip for Iomega. Still with an EPS of 2Mark The Trader-7/29/1996
1612 Your profile does not say much about your investing experience. I am curious hoMark The Trader-7/29/1996
1611 Mark, when estimates go from $.55 to $.20, I call that revision so dramatic as hoodie-7/29/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News