SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16379No one here is a bigger moron than me, Hal, for buying it all the way down, finaAmboy Charlie-12/15/2004
16378Frank is by no means a moron, Charlie. Unless past mistakes with Ampex investmenHal Campbell-12/15/2004
16377I don't understand the point of NTBW's many editorial comments. He soundAmboy Charlie-12/15/2004
16376Posted on yahoo brd.Re: Way OT by: nosajthebrokewarrior 12/14/04 09:48 pm Msg: 1funtimes-12/15/2004
16375Possible buyout? Take a look at this. My apologies to the board I haven't chriscraft-12/12/2004
16374We're all still here, Chris, in case you hadn't noticed. We've been Amboy Charlie-12/12/2004
16373Where is everyone on this board? Look at what is going on here! This company ischriscraft-12/11/2004
16372FWIW Just my opinion, but while I do not have much faith in technical analysis Hal Campbell-12/11/2004
1637178 Days to Go! News release dated 11.30.04 @ 11:31 AM ET stated... "AmpexThomas Kirwin-12/11/2004
16370The flip side of negotiations result would be that if Kodak settles, the Ampex cHal Campbell-12/10/2004
16369Additional Settlements Expected Within Days Hey Charlie, Kodak isn't the oThomas Kirwin-12/10/2004
16368Thanks for the ITC info, Charlie. If they do not settle (and they negotiated witHal Campbell-12/10/2004
16367Hi Big Joe. Welcome to the inimitable Ampex experience. Gus was wise enough tHal Campbell-12/10/2004
16366$1.02 may seem like a bargain but everything hinges on the outcome of the ITC inAmboy Charlie-12/10/2004
16365 big-joe_5216-12/9/2004
16364 big-joe_5216-12/9/2004
16363Since this is where all the really smart people post (relatively speaking), I wibig-joe_5216-12/9/2004
16362This board has been unusually silent lately. Anyone have a handle on the action Amboy Charlie-12/9/2004
16361Thanks Hal, with my luck I'll probably get stopped out the second before posAmboy Charlie-12/7/2004
16360Sue'm - iPod Photo Uses Thumbnail Tech You bet your sweet bippy - Apple hasThomas Kirwin-12/6/2004
16359Music 'handhelds' are going visual by: celerinosanchez (39/M/Princeton,Thomas Kirwin-12/6/2004
16358Hope good news comes sooner rather than later,Charlie. And that O'Neill techHal Campbell-12/6/2004
16357I finally took the plunge last night at 21. I feel safe that there is a lot of sAmboy Charlie-12/6/2004
16356With buying interest seemingly on the wane at this level a sell consideration miAmboy Charlie-12/6/2004
16355Legal fees should be contained in the intellectual property cost category. If I Hal Campbell-12/6/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News