SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ultra OTC Fund - UOPIX
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2063 27 0 UOPIX
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1638<i>You have determined UOPIX to be a losing proposition, but what promptedlifeisgood-5/22/2001
1637<i>...until this bear market actually ends, and I'll guarantee it doeslifeisgood-5/22/2001
1636I hate to be drawn into this, but: LIG asks: <i>I would challenge anyone bob wallace-5/22/2001
1635Hi LIG, You have determined UOPIX to be a losing proposition, but what promptedJohn-5/22/2001
1634Todd, I think the UOPIX is much like going to the casino to gamble. Sure some lifeisgood-5/22/2001
1633Hi LIG, Thanks much for your concern. The last year has been a bit trying, andJohn-5/22/2001
1632Whoa, this thread's gettin mean. LIG, what convinced you that UOPIX is an aTodd Reichardt-5/22/2001
1631<i>How much has your investment in UOPIX lost (percentage wise) over the plifeisgood-5/22/2001
1630<i>How much has your investment in UOPIX lost (percentage wise) over the pJohn-5/21/2001
1629<i>I've been very pleased with the results so far</i> OK John, lifeisgood-5/21/2001
1628Hi Bob, Yep, my system gets bold when its making money and shy when its losing Todd Reichardt-5/21/2001
1627Hi Bud, It's really a way of saying "sizing", or how big of a posTodd Reichardt-5/21/2001
1626Hi Bob, The NDX futures are hugging the flatline this evening. I hope we see sJohn-5/21/2001
1625Hi Bud, Sure. The method I am presently using dictates that you maintain an evJohn-5/21/2001
1624Hi John, I don't remember seeing the details of your balancing, but that coTodd Reichardt-5/21/2001
1623from briefing.com: <b>the type of aggressive bidding for stocks currentlybob wallace-5/21/2001
1622well, when I get mt confirmation number, the last four digits I assume to be jusbob wallace-5/21/2001
1621Bob re: # of uopix trades Where do you get that info from,so close to the close?mistermj-5/21/2001
1620Hi John; Would you mind detailing the concept you mention in your last paragrapbudweeder-5/21/2001
1619Todd I was just ribbing you a bit. I gathered that yesterday your system had abob wallace-5/21/2001
1618Hi Todd; Just to clarify for my understanding....."the key to this, is monbudweeder-5/21/2001
1617Hi Todd, I agree. That's why I have taken a much more aggressive approach John-5/21/2001
1616Hi Bob, <<<seems like you are playing catch up a little bit>>>Todd Reichardt-5/21/2001
1615Hi Bernie, I fail to understand your actions as compared to your comments. UOPJohn-5/21/2001
1614Hi Bob, Again, I concur with you. With the strong NDX surge after my previous John-5/21/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News