SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EMC How high can it go?
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17183 357 0 EMC
Emcee:  Just4fun2 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16408Lizzie, RE: <i>The truth is, these days, analysts are far less likely to GVTucker-2/22/2006
16407How many cases have you seen where analysts issue a sell bias AFTER the stock haJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16406You are right. 25 out of 28 analysts who follow EMC rate it at least outperform.meveric-2/22/2006
16405I agree you shouldn't believe everything analysts say but otoh there is not Lizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16404Rule number one - don't believe everything that analysts say... Rule numberJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16403You still at it?. I has become increasingly more difficult for EMC shareholders meveric-2/22/2006
16402With what? IBM's PE is too low to do it with stock. CSCO is another story Elroy-2/22/2006
16401I wonder when the yearly rumor that IBM is interested in buying EMC will surfaceJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16400<i>especially when so far the analyst is being proven right.</i> YoElroy-2/22/2006
16399Let's just forget it and say that I value the opinion of an analyst named Asmeveric-2/22/2006
16398My point is that analyst's comment is a flippant off the cuff remark. I expElroy-2/21/2006
16397I do not disagree with you and I hope you are right about 06 being the turn aroumeveric-2/21/2006
16396what you are describing is a stock market in general problem. The S&P has gLizzie Tudor-2/21/2006
16395"EMC is doing great as a company and the share price must eventually followmeveric-2/21/2006
16394<i>""Raymond James analyst Ashok Kumar said that while EMC execuElroy-2/20/2006
16393What's inconsequential about this especially the part about Tucci having to meveric-2/20/2006
16392That article was full of inconsequential fluff as far as I can tell.Elroy-2/20/2006
16391It has been suggested that one of the reasons for EMC's lackluster performanmeveric-2/20/2006
16390I was at Fry's electronics this weekend. They were selling terrabyte NAS filTigerPaw-2/20/2006
16389what I don't really understand is NTAP vs. Cisco. NTAP is practically a cisLizzie Tudor-2/20/2006
16388I just don't see the spectacular growth with EMC that I see with NTAP and NTSPSEIFERT-2/20/2006
16387I think EMC is a second class competitor against NTAP in NAS. At the same time SPSEIFERT-2/20/2006
16386EMC seems like a good pick to me, as does ELX. ELX does basically the same thinElroy-2/19/2006
16385well the reason I am here is because we have a few blowouts in storage, first qlLizzie Tudor-2/18/2006
16384<i>I don't know why EMC doesn't get into the NAS business</i>Elroy-2/18/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News