SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1642 Gotta kick 'em when their down. <g> Sent you a PM in re Tim. David Lawrence-9/8/1998
1641 Oh, so we're back to that, huh? When I started following Safeguard et al iJohn Arnopp-9/8/1998
1640 Diamond got an upgrade today. CatPee too, I think. David Lawrence-9/8/1998
1639 Not to rain on the parade, but Nasdaq added 6%, Dow added 5%, SFE's NAV adJohn Arnopp-9/8/1998
1638 Helps? I think restoring $400 million of value back into Safeguard's publiJohn Arnopp-9/4/1998
1637 John, Hopes this helps. NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters) - Fast-growing computer consllwk7051@aol.com-9/4/1998
1636 Anyone know how this CATP thing will play out? <b>NAV is not much more tJohn Arnopp-9/4/1998
1635 Cambridge is getting smacked around today. Down 35% @ 1:30 EST. Wharf Rat-9/4/1998
1634 Mike, Thanks for your analysis. As usual it is lucid, intelligent and to the robert miller-8/30/1998
1633 A difficult week and month for all. Time to take a deep breath, think logicallmichael r potter-8/29/1998
1632 John, It is hard to say what is the right move with sfe. It has been hit with llwk7051@aol.com-8/28/1998
1631 Bryan & all: NAV = $25.28, so it sucks just as much as Safeguard's priJohn Arnopp-8/28/1998
1630 I am getting really tired of this stock. I have been really patient with it anBryan Steffen-8/28/1998
1629 <i>>>That works out to somewhere between $23.40 to $25.20.</i>David Lawrence-8/28/1998
1628 Good luck, David. The odds in Vegas have to be better than on Wall Street todaJohn Arnopp-8/28/1998
1627 <i>>>Good luck.</i> Thanks. I'm in Vega$ for the weekendDavid Lawrence-8/27/1998
1626 David, I believe you are correct when you say it is not over. Good luck. Roberllwk7051@aol.com-8/27/1998
1625 Thanks, Mike. I think you mean early 1997, not 1996. But there is another facJohn Arnopp-8/27/1998
1624 Question not directed at me, but could I venture an opinion? If you remember tmichael r potter-8/27/1998
1623 David, I picked up some more SFE at 28 today. Do you think it was premature? John Arnopp-8/27/1998
1622 I expect a (market) rebound in the morning. Technically, we're way oversoldDavid Lawrence-8/27/1998
1621 David do you think the selloff is anywhere close to the bottom. This is gettillwk7051@aol.com-8/27/1998
1620 Bryan, If that happened, I think they could still restore some credibility if John Arnopp-8/26/1998
1619 <i>"Of 6,580 companies examined in the DLJ study, 6,107, or 93 perceDavid Lawrence-8/26/1998
1618 I am gettig a sinking feeling that SFE is not going to complete three offeringsBryan Steffen-8/26/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News