SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EMC How high can it go?
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17183 357 0 EMC
Emcee:  Just4fun2 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16433I'm just trying to point out that shorting every stock in sight has not beenLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16432"GOOG is my largest position." That explains it. The problem is there meveric-2/22/2006
16431GOOG is my largest position. I use it as a barometer of sentiment and analyst pLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16430This is the first time since you started posting here that you mentioned EMC I bmeveric-2/22/2006
16429OTOTOT <I>a stock is or is not a buy is no more valuable than any reasonabLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16428I read analyst reports every day. Their opinion about whether a stock is or is Elroy-2/22/2006
16427the reason it came up is whether analysts are worth listening to when they say ELizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16426This is the EMC board you wackos! EMC is growing, and the share price hasn'Elroy-2/22/2006
16425Lizzie, RE: <i>But here is the history on GOOG, and since you are trying GVTucker-2/22/2006
16424Yeah and I bet you were one of those investors who believed the analysts right uJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16423read my post. GOOG from ipo to march 14 05. 4 sells 15 hold 15 buy and strong Lizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16422I can't really say whether the buys are warranted on EMC or not, because I dLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16421LOL! C'mon Lizzie, analysts are sheep and lemmings! >>GOOG did not haJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16420they didn't jump on board Jake, in fact UBS and S&P and others were sellLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16419You stated that GOOG was a "beehive of analyst sells". That is a far GVTucker-2/22/2006
16418Hey, do what you want to do... Just note that analysts and weathermen have a lJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16417In other words believe them if I like what they say.meveric-2/22/2006
16416Let me refresh your memory on GOOG, the fastest growing company in terms of profLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16415This is great now this is turning into a GOOGL thread. At least that will keep tmeveric-2/22/2006
16414GOOG has had the hype, mojo and momo so all the analysts jumped aboard...JakeStraw-2/22/2006
16413Lizzie, RE: <i>As you know, last year GOOG was a behive of analyst sells GVTucker-2/22/2006
16412the reason there are so many buys on GOOG is because GOOG proved itself and is nLizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
16411>>an analyst won't issue a buy unless the fundamentals really support JakeStraw-2/22/2006
16410>>I don't believe them now In this case, why not? EMC has been reportJakeStraw-2/22/2006
16409sure analysts aren't infallable but my point is that these days, an analyst Lizzie Tudor-2/22/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News