SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Heavy Machinery. CAT DE CSE DDC CUM
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
190 9 0
Emcee:  Petrus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
165 Where did all of the money go, if Asians have no money? Did their money flow toWade-5/26/1999
164 I just saw this one: A.G. Edwards issued a Company Report on July 8, 1998 for Wade-5/26/1999
163 Paul, TEC reported earning of 0.35 for Q2 today. This is a great achievement uWade-5/26/1999
162 Paul, Thank you. I am glad to know you like it. I will post yours to the BOOM tWade-5/25/1999
161 Wade, I took a look at BOOM - very attractive. The stock is trading near bPaul Berliner-5/25/1999
160 "Look! Who is spamming? You are the only one doing it at here." Yournorm chin-5/24/1999
159 Look! Who is spamming? You are the only one doing it at here. Wade-5/24/1999
158 Off topic Nomally I don't respond to posts like yours. I'm making an enorm chin-5/24/1999
157 You come to this thread and you have yet to contribute a single post on the relPaul Berliner-5/24/1999
156 Off topic Like Wade, you don't get it, do you? SI is no one's personalnorm chin-5/24/1999
155 Norm, why don't you go back to policing the 'Etrade Sucks' thread. Paul Berliner-5/24/1999
154 Yes, God. Wade-5/24/1999
153 Off topic You never learn, do you? You cannot seem to leave well alone. First norm chin-5/24/1999
152 Paul, Thanks. I do not tout stocks except bring it up to people's attentioWade-5/24/1999
151 Whatever, officer. Paul Berliner-5/24/1999
150 Off topic "Must the discussion of individual stocks always constitute spanorm chin-5/24/1999
149 Must the discussion of individual stocks always constitute spamming? Paul Berliner-5/24/1999
148 Off topic "Wade, I have no problem with discussing individual stocks relenorm chin-5/24/1999
147 Paul, Thank you for the support. I only invest in companies I studied and felWade-5/24/1999
146 Wade, I have no problem with discussing individual stocks relevant to the thrPaul Berliner-5/24/1999
145 I will forward this to Jill. Thank you. Wade-5/23/1999
144 Off Topic "Are you on drug or something too heavy for you?" I saidnorm chin-5/23/1999
143 Are you on drug or something too heavy for you? Wade-5/23/1999
142 Off Topic "If you have problem with me, please write to Jill, Webmistressnorm chin-5/23/1999
141 I was asking for opinions at relevant threads. Please get off my back. If you hWade-5/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News