VRA (AMEX), Viragen INC. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
VRA (AMEX), Viragen INC.

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1590	21	0	VRA

Emcee: Andrew Ross	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
165	You are absolutely, positively, 100% correct. There were very powerful co	GJF174	-	4/1/1997
164	Thanks JohnV. The fact that Viragen was selected as the preferred stategic pa	John Doyle	-	4/1/1997
163	This is the positive rumor that I had heard and hinted toward previously. Hope	JohnV	-	4/1/1997
162	A good post, GJF174.	JohnV	-	3/31/1997
161	This is why in the previous posts, I suggested that you call the company d	GJF174	-	3/31/1997
160	Does anyone have an address for a company home page? Does Viragen make both	Harold Engstrom	-	3/31/1997
159	to Bernard, You are overanalyzing. I am not a "card" in any game.	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/31/1997
158	to GJF174: First of all my opinion on this chat channel, me alone, is not a f	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/31/1997
157	Just so no one has to go looking for it, here is the FDA news release. Note the	John Doyle	-	3/31/1997
156	(following) Another thing ---- the company's managers have always claimed t	Bernard I. Gentile	-	3/31/1997
155	Dear GJF174, I am not sure the company is taking a beating, but shareholders c	Bernard I. Gentile	-	3/31/1997
154	If these are the types of stocks you like than look at ATEG; it may be	SirAlexx	-	3/30/1997
153	I'm not searching for any reasons why the stock is lower. It is simp	GJF174	-	3/30/1997
152	John, I would like you to itemize, in reply, what I have said that is not cor	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/30/1997
151	GJF174: I agree. There is something really fishy about the Mark Rosenberg post	John Doyle	-	3/30/1997
150	to GJF174, I didn't plan to upset you. You seem to be searching for rea	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/29/1997
149	Nice note. Linda	Linda Kaplan	-	3/28/1997
148	If you checked things out, Mark, how come you think there are 60MM shares	GJF174	-	3/27/1997
147	to John V, You are not a fool. If you do lose on this situation, just mark it	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/27/1997
146	Unfortunately, I agree with you, Mark. I was a fool to invest in this company	JohnV	-	3/27/1997
145	to GJF174, It might be a good idea to check the next public list of shorts on	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/26/1997
144	Yes! Linda	Linda Kaplan	-	3/26/1997
143	How to expect a company to manufacture news? You report news when you hav	GJF174	-	3/26/1997
142	This stock is so weak its ridiculous. I've been hearing some very positive	JohnV	-	3/26/1997
141	to GJF174, The small cap market is in shambles right now. Look at the entire	mark alan rosenberg	-	3/25/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):