SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16504Get out while the getting is good and get back in at a lower level. You might evAmboy Charlie-12/28/2004
16503I'm certainly not a TA guy (see today's yahoo board for those types), buP Jones-12/28/2004
16502I welcome the company, Dave. We know we've visited similar euphoric crossrHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16501ouch, that hurtsPaul Lee-12/28/2004
16500Charlie: I'm with Hal, as much as I would love to trade, I've had such Dave Heibeck-12/28/2004
16499<i>Anyone know a good stock market astrologer? </i> Arch Crawford ?Triffin-12/28/2004
16498Tomorrow is last trading day for funds to get settlement on CY 2004 books, so whOPVet-12/28/2004
16497<< I'm out of halibut. >> will it flounder there for long, BooHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16496<< I think you've got the wrong idea >> I often do , Charlie. MHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16495Ampex' signature trading characteristic going back years -it's still thebootsup1-12/28/2004
16494Actually, I think you've got the wrong idea, Hal. There's lots of buyingAmboy Charlie-12/28/2004
16493No doubt, Hal. But someone had to have bought them at a price close to this. MayAmboy Charlie-12/28/2004
16492I think those were most likely sold long ago, Charlie. But no way to be sure. PrHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16491I wonder if it's all those shares that were converted at 2.75 that are cominAmboy Charlie-12/28/2004
16490I should have Charley, and was sorely tempted, but decided to hold and let the sHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16489Hal, I hope you took your shares out today and recovered most of your cash valuAmboy Charlie-12/28/2004
16488It's all your fault again, Paul <g> Yeah hit a wall finally. MomentumHal Campbell-12/28/2004
16487ok, i'll do it again 50Paul Lee-12/28/2004
16486Oh Man, please don't count on me, John. I thought the Redskins were gonna beHal Campbell-12/27/2004
16485Hal,The way I look at todays action we have 375,000 shares in new hands.375,000 John M-12/27/2004
16484longtime Ampex investor here...back to 1996 when it waw being recommended in thedepodestarules-12/27/2004
16483<< because one party hadn't been contacted in time >> sounds liHal Campbell-12/27/2004
16482Re: Settlement, Don't know the answer to that one, Hal, just a motion filed Amboy Charlie-12/27/2004
16481not quite as strong...not quite as smooth. But not bad.Hal Campbell-12/27/2004
16480Holding here because I think the stock has a shot at much higher prices and I waHal Campbell-12/27/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):