SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3276 17 0 DEC
Emcee:  Dave Gahm Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1651 When you look to the chart of Digital Equipment as a technical analyst, you canGOLDFINGER-7/2/1997
1650 All, This is from a small company,but a good small sample is better than a badGeorge Dvorsky-7/1/1997
1649 GOLDFINGER, I got into DEC when it was at $31/share and have seen it get up toMystic-7/1/1997
1648 Paul, Regarding the results we expect for this fiscal year 1997, I may say thaGOLDFINGER-7/1/1997
1647 It's been a while since I have heard anyone at CNBC say anything positive aPaul Mathis-6/30/1997
1646 Tom, Other than Intel's clout, I've heard nothing that would weaken DECGeorge Dvorsky-6/30/1997
1645 George, I deal with DEC's Customer Service admin daily and it has needed sJohn M. Gelnieau-6/29/1997
1644 George, is your hand crank referring to the reboot required to go into protecteTom M-6/29/1997
1643 Rob, Since, I believe, it was you who pointed out that those patents were filedGeorge Dvorsky-6/29/1997
1642 Now, now Rob, be careful with that 2 billion, we've seen annual losses of tPaul Mathis-6/28/1997
1641 We shall see. But let's drag this out: Intel counter-sues. Why? Patent IRob Young-6/28/1997
1640 Rob, re: So why are there even talks this early? Digital wishes to chat or Joey Smith-6/28/1997
1639 Assumptions that aren't much of a stretch. Merced development is well undeRob Young-6/28/1997
1638 What a great opening we had today! I never figured out if it was the SingaporePaul Mathis-6/27/1997
1637 <<<<Until you see the terms of the settlement, I think you should rCharles Skeen-6/27/1997
1636 I don't understand why you're so convinced this is positive. It might Charles Tutt-6/27/1997
1635 I won't get too excited about settlement talks. So far the suit has gone tJeffrey James-6/27/1997
1634 Rob; Great posting...and analysis...sure hope it turns out the way you describstock bull-6/27/1997
1633 Yes... If Intel was so innocent.... The whole sequence of events in retrospectRob Young-6/27/1997
1632 Intel & DEC in settlement talks (WSJ): pcquote.newsalert.com Not a lot ofTom M-6/27/1997
1631 Reasons behind outsource are here: techweb.com RobRob Young-6/26/1997
1630 Of course the suit has merit, where is the response? Regarding monsieur DentonRob Young-6/25/1997
1629 I couldn't agree more George. I don't know about an INTC connection, bPaul Mathis-6/25/1997
1628 Just when I thought I could go to bed early for a change, it's Denton againGeorge Dvorsky-6/25/1997
1627 No news, just muse. DEC's daily chart was odd today. Up early, tanked withGeorge Dvorsky-6/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):