SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tirex Corporation (TXMC)
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1878 15 0 TXMC
Emcee:  JohnO Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1653Hi Dave, Yea I was wondering the same thing. Maybe the owers where exercising Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-12/18/2002
1652Holy crap. any explanation for today??? siliconinvestor.comdkgross-12/17/2002
1651are you sure MMMary's posts were deleted? I don't see any missing numbeMahatmabenfoo-11/3/2002
1650That Mmmary's posts were pulled is disturbing information. I didn't knoMahatmabenfoo-11/1/2002
1649Question: How can I question Mmmary's very nicely documented evidence if allLORD ERNIE-10/31/2002
1648Ernie, this is not "lol" funny -- TXMC is a pump job, which means 1,00Mahatmabenfoo-10/30/2002
1647And the rest not (lol)LORD ERNIE-10/30/2002
1646<I>I've been threatened a bunch of times by CEOs saying they're gobenchpress550-10/30/2002
1645OT to Lord Ernie: the foto ** is ** real! - CharlesMahatmabenfoo-10/29/2002
1644A key aspect of evaluating TXMC is evaluating the reliability of those who are bMahatmabenfoo-10/29/2002
1643--- I did get sued one time No kiddin! The only instance I heard of that was IMahatmabenfoo-10/29/2002
1642Charles, I've been threatened a bunch of times by CEOs saying they're gmmmary110/28/2002
1641mmMary, all very interesting. A major -- and I think not reported -- characterMahatmabenfoo-10/28/2002
1640I knew better than to buy TMOT :>) Mostly, I'm just fed up with non-topidkgross-10/28/2002
1639Just like her foto, not real?LORD ERNIE-10/28/2002
1638Whoa! mmmary! Nice post! jmhollen is very rude in his opinions, which mostly cMahatmabenfoo-10/27/2002
1637kind of an inapropriate post for the TXMC board, don'tcha think?dkgross-10/27/2002
1636OT: jmhollen, the insider jmhollen claimed he was an insider director at ECNC. mmmary-10/26/2002
1635Whatever works for you, Bubba. No need to tread the inner sanctum, when you undjmhollen-10/26/2002
1634You remind me of Sam-Dan from the TRKR days. He was a great pumper and thought flippity-flop-10/26/2002
1633Your welcome. The value of your unsolicited and volunteered consultation is worjmhollen-10/23/2002
1632jmhollen wrote: ""..........and a par-tri-idge in a pear treeeeeeeeeeeMahatmabenfoo-10/23/2002
1631<i>"..........and a par-tri-idge in a pear treeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.......jmhollen-10/17/2002
1630--I had a very pleasant conversation with John Threshie this afternoon. good foMahatmabenfoo-10/16/2002
1629Hey John, Thanks for passing on information regarding your recent conversation SCOOBEY-DO-10/16/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News