Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
17679	72	0	AMPX

Emcee: Gus	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
16579	Thanks Hal, & Siliconmember, I appreciate your responses. IMO I think there	DrD	-	1/5/2005
16578	It seems like Kodak is using the Quantel device as their reason for not settling	SanDiegoInvestor	-	1/5/2005
16577	edis.usitc.gov You need to go first to www.itc.gov	Amboy Charlie	-	1/5/2005
16576	If it does go to court, I am informed that the time lag could be <b>very&l	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16575	If ADS had a halfway decent fourth quarter, I hope Ampex does an early release o	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16574	We all know the bullish scenario....rivers of cash from a series of digital deal	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16573	Siliconmember ( any relation to Steely Dan?<g>) on Yahoo posted the link,	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16572	Hope the ITG filtering does play out and bring some cash somewhere DrD. Hope you	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16571	Charlie, could you provide an actual link to the EDIS website on the article you	DrD	-	1/5/2005
16570	Thanks for the info , Charlie. Do you have a link? I know they had to respond or	Hal Campbell	-	1/5/2005
16569	Kodak's reply to the Ampex suit before the ITC is now on file at he EDIS web	Amboy Charlie	-	1/5/2005
16568	The upcoming CES in Las Vegas is purported to have a great many new digital prod	DrD	-	1/4/2005
16567	Thanks Boots. Trading seems OK to me too (if teetering on da edge just a little)	Hal Campbell	-	1/4/2005
16566	Hal, looks as if axc has found a level here...and w/the potentials I would now c	bootsup1	-	1/4/2005
16565	<< Remember BCST? >> Do I! He knew how to promote and, above all el	Hal Campbell	-	1/4/2005
16564	Hi Hal & All, Happy New Year... OT: Remember BCST? - Founder Cuban writes	digger	-	1/4/2005
16563	Wasn't actually too tough this time around, Charlie. I had posted it some ye	Hal Campbell	-	1/2/2005
16562	Hal, Your research skills never cease to amaze me. Where do you get this inform	Amboy Charlie	-	1/1/2005
16561	Some points well taken, Charlie. No question there is greater risk as the price	Hal Campbell	-	1/1/2005
16560	I am out and hoping for a safe reentry point. I'm probably the last person a	Amboy Charlie	-	1/1/2005
16559	You're right. I was stopped out, a couple of times. I'm skittish about t	Amboy Charlie	-	1/1/2005
16558	Amboy-I seriously question your logic here. You state-"Maybe the big playe	depodestarules	-	1/1/2005
16557	Charlie clearing has an agenda! He has been relentless in his negativity for th	AXCinextvITGjackpot	-	1/1/2005
16556	hey guys, if you think he would write an article to pump and dump a stock, espec	depodestarules	-	1/1/2005
16555	There was always that "potential" before with the VCR patents but Japa	Amboy Charlie	-	12/31/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):