SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
IPPs and Merchant Energy Co.s
An SI Board Since September 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3358 82 0
Emcee:  Larry S. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1658OFF TOPIC Anyone else have a problem with the new SI screen format? I personallNDBFREE-3/25/2003
1657Williams Cos. - Oklahoma Energy Company Sells Wholesale Contract TULSA, Oklahomenergyplay-3/24/2003
1656DUK mentioned favorably on Wall St Week: - "Frank Cappiello is surprised atLarry S.-3/22/2003
1655Facts, Opinions, and Market responses. In a review of the posts since the incepJerome-3/22/2003
1654Sounds like a new accounting firm, or may be related to exiting of certain businenergyplay-3/22/2003
1653RRI is restating earnings for 2000-2002. It amounts to 6% change in net income faniela-3/21/2003
1652RRI vs CNP chart somewhat interesting... siliconinvestor.com One reason for weaItsAllCyclical-3/21/2003
1651Nor do I, as a rule, and I wasn't suggesting a trade (tho it may have seemedtom pope-3/21/2003
1650Tom, i am not trading this sector, i own positions in many of the companies for Larry S.-3/21/2003
1649Was anybody following the trading in EP as it deflated from the opening surge? wtom pope-3/21/2003
1648dunno, it ran a lot and 16 looks like resistance. be patient. <g> these Larry S.-3/21/2003
1647But why is DUK tanking????aerosappy-3/21/2003
1646oh ye of little faith on TE. stock up over 11 today. eomLarry S.-3/21/2003
1645one more thing: if EP can get a credit upgrade, the lower cost of financing goinLarry S.-3/21/2003
1644It's not quite true that EP was as pure as the driven snow. This is from thetom pope-3/21/2003
1643looking at the time value of money, the ending of litigation expenses, possible Larry S.-3/21/2003
1642EP sure is paying a lot if, as what they state is true, there was no wrongdoing.Keith J-3/21/2003
1641MIR-"We secured special permission from environmental agencies to do so. BuJoe Stocks-3/20/2003
1640Thanks. I was wondering whether the postponement might indicate disagreement wittom pope-3/20/2003
1639Here's the WSJ report on the EP settlement: <i>El Paso to Pay $1.7 Bitom pope-3/20/2003
1638EP news seems to be moving the whole sector. eomLarry S.-3/20/2003
1637FERC decision on the contracts... Don't know if we can really read much intfromBermuda-3/20/2003
1636EP settlement with CA potentially very positive for the sector. 1) Less than haItsAllCyclical-3/20/2003
1635Does anybody care to venture a guess as to the significance of this relative to tom pope-3/20/2003
1634Out of TE at 10.40. Don't like the way it's acting here. It may continItsAllCyclical-3/19/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):