SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
James Cramer
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
766 33 0
Emcee:  cicak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
166 agree love the words hate the layout kill the fancy pictures simply put eveRon McKinnon-1/12/1999
165 good man. what now. mr.mark-1/12/1999
164 I agree with these comments about thestreet.com's site. jjcJames J. Cramer-1/12/1999
163 Gee, I guess I was right about INDI/CBS Marketwatch.COM sympathy play...still dJimbo Cobb-1/11/1999
162 <<...''any plans to take TheStreet.COM public.." >> DSliderOnTheBlack-1/10/1999
161 Jim: Do you think INDI (Individual Investor Group... iionline.com) will run onJimbo Cobb-1/10/1999
160 Let customers choose their own interface As you can see from my comments and tSnowshoe-1/10/1999
159 New Site vs. Old Site.... I share KZNerd's opinion; frustrating that I havSliderOnTheBlack-1/9/1999
158 I agree that the new site has been flubbed but not due to performance which seegrok-1/9/1999
157 good post, greg. that is often the case when someone decides to <i>impromr.mark-1/8/1999
156 TheStreet.com Flubs Site Revamp I've been using the new site for a few daySnowshoe-1/8/1999
155 Cramer; ie: The '' NOSX" Jim; in all seriousness - I'd loSliderOnTheBlack-1/7/1999
154 Yes, of course that's what happened. But the question is why the small capgrok-1/4/1999
153 the smaller tech got the big rise Thursday causing the big pop in Nasdaq. steve susko-1/3/1999
152 OK, can anyone explain Dec 31 when nasdaq 100 index was up 25.03 (1.38%) yet msgrok-1/1/1999
151 Tastes, you are absolutely correct. It was an oversight on my part. Please MskiHntr-1/1/1999
150 In the future, please credit the author when you post a copy of his work, and tDon Pueblo-1/1/1999
149 Happy New Year, Jim, I wish you and yours a healthy and prosperous new year. HMskiHntr-1/1/1999
148 Yowser, what was that stuff today with AOL, CMB, and AN? Looking over time anMark Davis-12/31/1998
147 Old Cramer versus New Cramer - the ''NOSX'' - Wrongamundo ! SaSliderOnTheBlack-12/31/1998
146 James - I really enjoyed your article today about your ISP being down. We'vcicak-12/30/1998
145 Ed: we often hear that from people who first look at us. People think, gee, whJames J. Cramer-12/28/1998
144 I think that when I subscribed to TSC I expected more specific investment advicEdwin Slonim-12/26/1998
143 in the spirit of the season, (and the skeptic thread from which i find myself smr.mark-12/24/1998
142 Jim, I guess you're just better suited for offense than defense; if it wereBostonView-12/23/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News