SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16651.5 million shares have traded pre-market. It's been a permanent fixture ocaly-9/19/2001
1664Looks huge to me - a 2 billion investment in total. We're talking serious cSea Otter-9/19/2001
1663Oak Tree, This doesn't look good for shorts, but who knows, maybe it's tuck-9/19/2001
1662scary for those of us in short -- If you believe that the vast majority of optioOak Tree-9/12/2001
16618,442 September calls traded today, and ~triple ave volume on the stock. 1000 Skeokalani'nui-9/10/2001
1660Damn, I saw that, but I'm so psychologically damaged I couldn't bring mytom pope-9/7/2001
1659MLNM breaks down today and ^BT and Ishares are off 2.5%. IMCL is up 5.1% on heakeokalani'nui-9/7/2001
1658Gruntal? In what context. BW article quoted them as saying IMCL could have $1B613-8/29/2001
1657Does anyone know what Gruntal recommended? Thanx- fredFred Levine-8/29/2001
1656If it goes to 100 first, I hope I have the will power to sell. I don't quit613-8/29/2001
1655Some interesting news. On the Sell side: There is a new pan-her antibody cockOak Tree-8/28/2001
1654Well, you probably made a buck. Reasonable pullback (note lower volume) in ligh613-8/28/2001
1653Your right about the short I covered today. Thanks for the advice.Oak Tree-8/28/2001
1652Oak - Granted, that it might be overvalued compared to a Pfizer of BMY. But per613-8/28/2001
1651Deeber - any idea of what they plan to charge for C225? Also, any idea of the suOak Tree-8/27/2001
1650I just shorted some more IMCL. I guess I don't think much is up. The bioteckOak Tree-8/27/2001
1649Up a point and volume already 500K. Either all the shorts are covering this pas613-8/27/2001
1648Designer Drugs:What's best for patients isn't always what's best forJim Oravetz-8/23/2001
1647Hmmm. Up on volume.613-8/23/2001
1646I'm new to the Imclone story and just beginning to do some research. AdmitteMass-8/21/2001
1645Actually, I wasn't saying that I thought IMCL was reasonably or unreasonablyWTSherman-8/21/2001
1644Might be different but anything that takes away from IMCL's stature as the b613-8/21/2001
1643MATZ has developed a new type of delivery system, not a new drug. Comparing itsWTSherman-8/20/2001
1642I know why it is off on IMCL but what's the story with MATX?613-8/20/2001
1641Here's a column from TSC that's pretty bad, it mentions IMCL in a derogaWTSherman-8/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News