SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16654Adduci, Mariachi, and Straumberg (sp?) seem to be handling the Kodak case. WholeHal Campbell-1/15/2005
16653Well, if Kodak and Altek choose to fight, a resolution will be a long time cominHal Campbell-1/15/2005
16652Re: Altek Corp? by: curiouswalker Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 01/15/05 12:Thomas Kirwin-1/15/2005
16651Interesting that Steptoe and Johnson did the ITC filings for Sanyo and Sony. FisHal Campbell-1/15/2005
16650Blast from the Distant Past <<"Ampex introduced its first consumer vHal Campbell-1/15/2005
16649Commerce One Web Services patents brought $15.5 million (USD). IMHO - That pricThomas Kirwin-1/15/2005
16648Thanks Hal EOMJaknik2-1/14/2005
16647There's a new document from the Kodak side at the EDIS website case #337-527Amboy Charlie-1/14/2005
16646Could happen, Charlie. They had to sue Sanyo, Sony, and now Kodak. Canon they Hal Campbell-1/14/2005
16645Yep<g> (just a dumb joke..I'm fond of dumb jokes)Hal Campbell-1/14/2005
16644Was that the Randy moon?OPVet-1/14/2005
16643That's precisely what's kept me so skeptical and fearful about jumping bAmboy Charlie-1/14/2005
16642<<Except for recent days, can you think of a better description for Ampex Hal Campbell-1/14/2005
16641Well, I suppose that as an Ampex owner, I am definitely a plaintiff - which is bOPVet-1/14/2005
16640John, my Ampex Shareholder Brother. If you are breaking even or ahead at this prHal Campbell-1/14/2005
16639well, at least we've gone from plaintive talking to plaintiffs talking,OpvetHal Campbell-1/14/2005
16638This is evidence that patent licensing fees are a real concern. Too bad all we cOPVet-1/14/2005
16637Message 20904612 I skimmed it too, Jak. They got some market share percentages Hal Campbell-1/13/2005
16636Does anyone know what the gist of the Street.Com's Article said? Care to sJaknik2-1/13/2005
16635Patent Arena Is Hot Tech giants edgy over Web services patent sale November Thomas Kirwin-1/13/2005
16634hi realnews, no dry cujones @100. split /dividends /future earnings.100m,patentsvavman-1/13/2005
1663350=2.50 70=3.50 80=4.00 90=4.50 100=5.00 120=6 150=7.50 .scenario 4.75=95. 75mivavman-1/13/2005
16632(Couldn't turn off fixed font so had to add comment in another post) If QuHal Campbell-1/13/2005
16631As everybody knows, underfunded pension plans are not unique to Ampex. ThousandsHal Campbell-1/13/2005
16630Hiya Charlie. If Qauntegy makes it out of bankruptcy, is there any way some of tHal Campbell-1/12/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News