SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1668A day to remember............. 1. GILD results 2. The share prices of ELN anscaram(o)uche-1/30/2003
1667One last one? Watching CRGN getting whacked towards all time lows after earningtuck-1/30/2003
1666Thanks, everyone, for the ideas. Wanna try to update re. your candidates, over scaram(o)uche-1/30/2003
1665More of a Mars shot -- because the data from the PIII pulmonary insulin trial wotuck-1/27/2003
1664Echo that on picking up more TLRK. I like it as a relatively high probability mCzechsinthemail-1/27/2003
1663Moonshot candidates not mentioned so far: AMEV, maybe GLFD (don't know what tuck-1/27/2003
1662Moonshot--BTRNjayhawk969-1/27/2003
1661Immunology Needs a '70s Groove the-scientist.com <i>...References 1. nigel bates-1/27/2003
1660so...my big bet on tlrk....yikes.. but i cannot help but continue to add at eachmopgcw-1/27/2003
1659Moonshot candidates - RIGL a lottery ticket for under one buck as well. Good sciSpekulatius-1/27/2003
1658>> Gwen must have been at least a quarter note flat at times << Liscaram(o)uche-1/27/2003
1657Ah, she looks good, but the duet with sucked. No Doubt is a fine act--off the CDMike McFarland-1/26/2003
1656Super Bowl...... Stefani was MVP.scaram(o)uche-1/26/2003
1655>> How is that for a plug? << Please keep them coming. I hope thatscaram(o)uche-1/25/2003
1654Rick, >>Anybody else have long-term moonshot candidates?>> I wouldIcebrg-1/25/2003
1653monster, recently discussed by Peter in the valuation thread....... finance.yahscaram(o)uche-1/25/2003
1652I'm exchanging posts with a basher at Yahoo, GLFD thread. Please don't scaram(o)uche-1/23/2003
1651ALT up 45% since that solid H&Q presentation. (eom)scaram(o)uche-1/23/2003
1650Message 18479811 and following post. Anyone trading the bounce should take proftuck-1/23/2003
1649<i>With the goal of more efficiently making this therapeutic enzyme availajayhawk969-1/23/2003
1648Given that LSBC is once again plumbing lows, this announcement might provide a dtuck-1/23/2003
1647OK, done. Take photos now, if desired. I'll make the remaining changes andscaram(o)uche-1/16/2003
1646OK, I'm going to take the first step to updating the portfolios, starting wiscaram(o)uche-1/16/2003
1645>> so will come out slightly above breakeven << Good to hear! &qscaram(o)uche-1/16/2003
1644I had been averaging down, so will come out slightly above breakeven. Either mopgcw-1/16/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News