SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1668The 1099 <b>or</b&gGraystone-7/18/2003
1667Jorj Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. It seems everyone see things diPatricia-7/18/2003
1666I disagree with your assessment of Jon. I think that he is responding to the samJorj X Mckie-7/18/2003
1665Hi Jorj I was just wondering something and hopefully maybe you can help out herPatricia-7/18/2003
1664The only person who has made threats on this thread, veiled or otherwise, is youJorj X Mckie-7/18/2003
1663Ah, old money, power and privilege (squandered, in this case...) vs. the uncouthJon Tara-7/18/2003
1662Now THAT'S a threat. Unveiled.Jon Tara-7/18/2003
1661Count, YOU certainly have no claim to objectivity. How can you expect objectiviJon Tara-7/18/2003
1660I didn't excuse the crime of violence. But neither do I excuse the crime of Jon Tara-7/18/2003
1659Count, I cannot believe the way you seem to be twisting Jon's words (and thwlcnyc-7/17/2003
1658You know what, knowing how the defendants operate, I think this post of yours isCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1657<i>Yes, even if they have a crime committed against them. Somebody goes inCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1656"You don't have a very good record here of objectivity" Where didJon Tara-7/17/2003
1655Your record posting here has been nothing less than an apologist for criminals. CountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1654"So why don't you say for the record here that you have no ulterior motJon Tara-7/17/2003
1653"We'll see, won't we?" Pretty-much sums-up the total of your Jon Tara-7/17/2003
1652I know the defendants think they invented intelligence and smart strategy, but tCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1651I have made it clear to you that those answers will be forthcoming in a formal sCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1650That's a very presumptive statement, my friend. Perhaps there are some veryCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1649Count, will you answer this: 1. Did you make trades with the defendant during tJon Tara-7/17/2003
1648"The defendants don't like that I'm handling this case for a simpleJon Tara-7/17/2003
1647I have come across some very good people here at SI. Some warm, wonderful carinCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1646This is a civil suit, but as I stated a long time ago, there are many criminal aCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1645<i>Please tell me you didn't really call it "income" in yourCountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
1644Sorry, and I am sure the defendants would like me to make further commentary on CountofMoneyCristo-7/17/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News