SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Is Secession Doable?
An SI Board Since November 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1968 11 0
Emcee:  SilentZ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
168<i>Having a contingency plan is always a good idea. Did you take a look atejek-11/4/2004
167<i>You still aren't getting it are you? It's PROPAGANDA, stupid.tejek-11/4/2004
166<I>But when a court(Mass.) tells the LEGISLATIVE Branch to make a Law allotejek-11/4/2004
165So secession is the dumbest idea in 144 years. Give it up. <I> So what?ManyMoose-11/4/2004
164>For your own sake, too, for that matter. You have NO IDEA what you are conteSilentZ-11/4/2004
163I knew it was a blue statelongnshort-11/4/2004
162<i>then why did an Oregon town ban it, because of a religious group.</imiraje-11/4/2004
161<I>Because people are different and socialism wants everyone the same</tejek-11/4/2004
160But the people of Mass. never had a say, put it up for a vote. Or are your afrailongnshort-11/4/2004
159No, you idiot. You can say anything you want to, but you will suffer the conseqManyMoose-11/4/2004
158<I> because one gender is essentially being excluded from participating. TimF-11/4/2004
157<i>It's impossible. The red states would have to allow it. You need totejek-11/4/2004
156My side? My side saved the Union and created the nation that we have today. ManyMoose-11/4/2004
155<i>Close this site down and dismiss the thought from your minds forever. Wtejek-11/4/2004
154<i>Like some court in Mass. by a vote of 4-3(with one lesbian) decides fortejek-11/4/2004
153why don't you run up to your nearest police station with a pellet gun screamlongnshort-11/4/2004
152<I>but you want to make a Law saying 50/50 representation, that's libetejek-11/4/2004
151no we won't but lets do it by county not by stateslongnshort-11/4/2004
150<I>What a country that will be, don't put the best in office just maketejek-11/4/2004
149<i>"States had a legal right to secede, affirmed by the idea of statetejek-11/4/2004
148<I>It's not serious. It's impossible. It is the ultimate pouting ftejek-11/4/2004
147No. If you insist every area have proportional representation you reduce diversTimF-11/4/2004
146>then why did an Oregon town ban it, because of a religious group. Do you thiSilentZ-11/4/2004
145<i>"Over all, blue America subsidizes red America to the tune of $90 tejek-11/4/2004
144<I>Thank you. At least I provided a more rational reason than the color oftejek-11/4/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News