SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
VPHM - Viropharma Inc
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2557 72 0 VPHM
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1682I was afraid you were going to say that. Don't these turkeys have access to tom pope-11/5/2003
16812.839M to go. (eom)scaram(o)uche-11/5/2003
1680I looked (a bit) but could not see they had sold before. If the original 3mm is tom pope-11/5/2003
1679Got me. (eom)scaram(o)uche-11/5/2003
1678Is this part of a continuing program, Rick?tom pope-11/5/2003
1677Aventis sold shares yesterday and Monday. 161K shares.scaram(o)uche-11/5/2003
1676three high volume periods..... SARS scare (with the HUGE seller), 371 croakingscaram(o)uche-11/4/2003
1675In the circular FWIW file, Deerfield dumped its 938,000s of vphm in the third qukeokalani'nui-11/4/2003
1674A new biotech business plan, that just fell into VPHM's lap....... invenscaram(o)uche-11/4/2003
1673You've already made the point, Rick. This is another take from the WSJ: Bytom pope-11/4/2003
1672Nature AOP, published online 26 October 2003; doi:10.1038/nature02099 An NS3 prscaram(o)uche-11/3/2003
167199.999999% unrelated, but...... 1. early in the SARS scare, metapneumovirus wascaram(o)uche-11/3/2003
1670emphasis mine (who is responsible for business development at VPHM, and what thescaram(o)uche-11/3/2003
1669We need someone to drag out one of those now-stale quotes, regarding relative &qscaram(o)uche-11/3/2003
1668Wish I could get a transcript of Spitzer's "mutual fund probe" Senscaram(o)uche-11/3/2003
1667made the NY Times this weekend too...... Message 19457689 In ten years, we'scaram(o)uche-11/2/2003
1666If you're a respected anti-viral group, you're going to have some good nscaram(o)uche-10/31/2003
1665thanks to gf for the link, additional reason, IMO, to stockpile small molecule ascaram(o)uche-10/31/2003
1664interesting day, above average volumetom pope-10/31/2003
1663Short interest (10/15) up just a tad to 2.9M, but remains largely unchanged for scaram(o)uche-10/28/2003
1662Of course, there's been no effort to follow-up in this area or to collaboratscaram(o)uche-10/28/2003
1661Could be this?: Press Release Source: Schering-Plough Corporation Schering-Prkrw-10/27/2003
1660I presume that the reference to a competitive molecule is a reference to BILN 20scaram(o)uche-10/27/2003
1659emphasis mine (who is responsible for business development at VPHM, and what thescaram(o)uche-10/23/2003
1658background (AASLD abstracts), just parking...... Presentation Title: HIGH ACTIVscaram(o)uche-10/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):