SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18024 14 0
Emcee:  damniseedemons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16849 3Com receives shareholder complaint SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MarcScrapps-3/26/1997
16848 Scrapps and All-- More rumor: old, or revived? If the suit against COMS lookJanice Shell-3/26/1997
16847 <<ANYONE LIKE THE IDEA OF SHORTING ZOOM OR BOCA?>> The idea is lovWigglesworth-3/26/1997
16846 Jeff here is a very interesting profile, html is not that good, but attitude geScrapps-3/26/1997
16845 ANYONE LIKE THE IDEA OF SHORTING ZOOM OR BOCA? ZOOM 8 5/8 UP 1/8 TODAY PE 24.59ralph keating-3/26/1997
16844 Jeffery, Thank you for your good T/A. I assume the fundamentals are such that Glenn D. Rudolph-3/26/1997
16843 Well Jeff if we can't take it...we'll sure as hell give it back to themScrapps-3/26/1997
16842 Patience, my boys. We'll have to see if we can do this, 'cause of the RDavid Lawrence-3/26/1997
16841 OT****CISCO What's your short-term sell point for CSCO? I've got a loaPullin-GS-3/26/1997
16840 We actually got thru $35 COMS a little while ago ($35.25), but it backed off anDavid Lawrence-3/26/1997
16839 My imagination is active as well. The bastards are playin' this for all it&Jeffery E. Forrest-3/26/1997
16838 Be sure to zip in a copy of your PILOT ROM (ask USRX for permission of course).Pullin-GS-3/26/1997
16837 Welllll, I'm not sure yet. Looks like I might be moving so I don't wantJeffery E. Forrest-3/26/1997
16836 I do...I want one!! From reading these posts my imagination is going wild. IsScrapps-3/26/1997
16835 Glenn, you're 100% correct. COMS at 34-35 and USRX at 59-60. LOTS of reasonJeffery E. Forrest-3/26/1997
16834 x3-news-scrapps Is this release trying to tell us they are going to have "tom pavlish-3/26/1997
16833 I like that...Mikey likes um too. :-) Btw. Jeffery have you found yourself an xScrapps-3/26/1997
16832 Skipper, I tried to find that same post to include with the Dell' Oro, but Jeffery E. Forrest-3/26/1997
16831 Paul, I'm sure there will be no objection. Who's a little notoriety goiDavid Lawrence-3/26/1997
16830 >> x2s, they don't snap, krackle or pop....just make a funny sqJeffery E. Forrest-3/26/1997
16829 Scrapps, Great post on x2 deployment. Thank you. GlennGlenn D. Rudolph-3/26/1997
16828 x2 News...... biz.yahoo.com Glenn same with me on the T/A...I still think of Scrapps-3/26/1997
16827 I have chosen to tweak some of the indicators and I also added an additional onPullin-GS-3/26/1997
16826 It appears there is resistance for COMS at 35. Actually, it is more than an appGlenn D. Rudolph-3/26/1997
16825 Michael in the article referred to in the post linked below is a chart with perScrapps-3/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News