SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1689 And the crowd goes wilder as the real numbers become more visible: $2.0 billioGus-4/5/2000
1688 Re: The vote. I think it will pass just like most votes of this nature do. WRobert Douglas-4/5/2000
1687 <i>"First. How is it that a management or board of directors has theMikeM54321-4/5/2000
1686 $440 million!! Unbelievable. I have two thoughts. First. How is it that a mRobert Douglas-4/5/2000
1685 <i>"Seagate shall pay to Veritas in immediately available funds, witMikeM54321-4/5/2000
1684 So what else is new? If Veritas OR Seagate terminates the deal for whatever reGus-4/5/2000
1683 Termination Fee (from 8K) (b) Seagate Payments. Struggling Investor-4/5/2000
1682 does anyone know any class action lawyers?Struggling Investor-4/5/2000
1681 thx, Gus. I'm sure you're dead right. This really is sickening. No, SEGStruggling Investor-4/5/2000
1680 <i>I just hope the institutional managers are onto this sham and care enoGus-4/5/2000
1679 Robert & Sam - I enjoyed Fintas's posts because he stayed with his priMark Madden-4/5/2000
1678 Just re-read Merrill Lynch research on VRTS and discovered that "there is Struggling Investor-4/5/2000
1677 <i>Do you remember that Yahoo poster Fintas, who just seemed to have disaRobert Douglas-4/5/2000
1676 Rob, <<Now that events have raised the suspicion that Luczo and crew wereSam-4/5/2000
1675 Stitch, my fellow observer, Now that events have raised the suspicion that LucRobert Douglas-4/5/2000
1674 Guys, You will have to forgive me as I actually felt that it was time for Al toStitch-4/5/2000
1673 thx, Gus. Maybe RJ has lost weight, quit smoking, found a fabulous plastic surgStruggling Investor-4/5/2000
1672 Thanks for the perspective and the inside color. I still remember the media acGus-4/5/2000
1671 worth reading thestreet.comtom pope-4/4/2000
1670 Stitch, I totally agree with you re: confidence in management - think that'Struggling Investor-4/4/2000
1669 Struggling Investor; Well I have done a silly thing, or maybe not so silly exceStitch-4/4/2000
1668 It seems to me the only good solution to this mess would be for a "friendlStarlight-4/4/2000
1667 Gus, ironically, I'm all too familiar with the original barbarians. Have seStruggling Investor-4/4/2000
1666 You're welcome. As I recall, the RJR Nabisco Board of Directors was outragGus-4/4/2000
1665 thx for more thoughtful posts, Gus. There is a great article at TheStreet.com Struggling Investor-4/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News