SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16904Simultaneous Precedings - ITC & Delaware Courts Hal, I believe that there Thomas Kirwin-2/6/2005
16903Sorry, that is Quantel (hope they do not turn out to be akin to Quantrell's Hal Campbell-2/6/2005
16902Kodak's last witness may prove to be their weakest. Chairman of Quantrell. THal Campbell-2/5/2005
16901"We Don't Need No Stinking Witnesses" Heh-heh. Sounds like an intCountbugula-2/5/2005
16900We Don't Need No Stinking Witnesses We've got an established precedent Thomas Kirwin-2/5/2005
16899A POST FROM THE YAHOO MESSAGE BOARD AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL THE AHOLES by: theultBuyerchoice-2/5/2005
16898Hal, I'll take a closer look at the details regarding the experts and get baCountbugula-2/5/2005
16897Thanks Count....you anticipated my question. Much appreciate your thoughts. IF Hal Campbell-2/5/2005
16896Thank you, Count. Count, a question. Have you read the Kodak list of expert Hal Campbell-2/5/2005
16895Thanks Hal, for your information about the expert witnesses in the ongoing AmpexCountbugula-2/5/2005
16894Thanks to Hal and IFLYUU for comments regarding the “Gordon Growth CapitalizatioCountbugula-2/5/2005
16893Ampex's witnesses have fine resumes, but Kodak's looks to be a much largHal Campbell-2/5/2005
16892The patent in the Kodak suit expires in March 2006, John. As an aside, there arHal Campbell-2/5/2005
16891Does Ampex patent expire in 2004 or 2009? kwiki.ffii.org Any thoughts?john b-2/5/2005
16890I'll check Bobby Hackett out, Boots. Thanks. This looks good too amazon.coHal Campbell-2/5/2005
16889Minor correction for the holdings of Craig McKibben, Ampex Chief Financial OfficCountbugula-2/5/2005
16888With Quantegy gone,for now at least, these folks are coming back to fill the voiAlan Cassaro-2/4/2005
16887Boots, it's really a joy to take an old scratchy record and clean it up digiAlan Cassaro-2/4/2005
16886Boy, you guys are really something! What an incredible repertoire of knowledge obootsup1-2/4/2005
16885>>>using an Ampex combination proton compressor and defribulator<<Alan Cassaro-2/4/2005
16884OT besides an exceptional artist, Al has the most phenomenal knowledge of rock nHal Campbell-2/4/2005
16883an old Ampex Buddy from Yahoo. IFLYUU, asked me to post this for him << FHal Campbell-2/4/2005
16882Interesting approach, Count. Thank You. Just a couple quick comments and a couHal Campbell-2/4/2005
16881Al. you'll live long enough to store your entire collection-- using an AmpHal Campbell-2/4/2005
16880Count, good to hear from you again. Thanks much for your analysis, and for givinDrD-2/4/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News