Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
17679	72	0	AMPX

Emcee: Gus	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
16954	Your thoughts are valued an any board, Count (which of course spares everyone fr	Hal Campbell	-	2/14/2005
16953	I don't think the long-term royalty situation is clear enough for Ampex to c	OPVet	-	2/14/2005
16952	Hal..."other directions".... Well...the debt and pension issues appea	bootsup1	-	2/13/2005
16951	Carly was fired for a relationship w/Vmaster. They simply couldn't have so	bootsup1	-	2/13/2005
16950	vmaster writes: <<Hey count, recount your 1999 drivel about this stock. se	Countbugula	-	2/13/2005
16949	Lets assume for a moment that the money starts rolling in to Ampex. Any ideas a	Hal Campbell	-	2/13/2005
16948	ROTFLOL! <<They (CPQ) made Lou Capellas, a guitar playing rock music affic	unfud	-	2/12/2005
16947	<< Surely I shouldn't blame Carley for your scanner, should I?>>	Hal Campbell	-	2/12/2005
16946	Hal, The HP Board of Directors abruptly fired Carley Fiorina this week and	OPVet	-	2/11/2005
16945	<< You haven't seen the newspaper the last three days. >> That&	Hal Campbell	-	2/11/2005
16944	Hal, You haven't seen the newspaper the last three days. Carly Fiorina was	Amboy Charlie	-	2/11/2005
16943	Opvet, is the same woman still the HP CEO? Obviously I hope you do well in both	Hal Campbell	-	2/11/2005
16942	THIS CO. is gift wrapped garbage.HERE WE GO STEELERS HERE WE GO.	vmaster	-	2/11/2005
16941	Given the settlements the minimum short term is@ 42 next pump up to 62+.Test 50	vmaster	-	2/11/2005
16940	Hal, I mentioned Kodak because I'm a HPQ shareholder who has been might	OPVet	-	2/11/2005
16939	Thanks for the good information, Mark and Harvey. VERY glad to hear that you sti	Hal Campbell	-	2/11/2005
16938	Hi Hal, hang in there. I reduced my holdings down in 2003 and 2004 from the 17,	Harvey H Anderson	-	2/11/2005
16937	There is interesting speculation that Hewlett Packard ought to buy either Kodak	OPVet	-	2/11/2005
16936	Found this site freepatentsonline.com For patents. It downloads fast and is e	digger	-	2/11/2005
16935	Ampex Lawyers Applying Pressure IMHO the lawyers were attempting to apply some	Thomas Kirwin	-	2/10/2005
16934	Thanks Tom. But then why do you think Ampex requested a change of final determin	Hal Campbell	-	2/10/2005
16933	Kodak VS Ampex Hal, My research indicates that the Initial Determination (ID)	Thomas Kirwin	-	2/10/2005
16932	Can only guess ( again, I am no lawyer), Charlie, but I think the Ampex lawyers	Hal Campbell	-	2/10/2005
16931	Qtr ongoing is unclear. Went back and read the release but not sure what kind of	Realnews	-	2/10/2005
16930	Hal, You don't think Bramson was a little late in going after Kodak through	Amboy Charlie	-	2/10/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):