SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3347 45 0 FONX
Emcee:  Dave Rebok Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1697 Carey: Microsoft's relationship with LHSPF is as tight as a drum. When theJerry String-3/4/1998
1696 Brian: You stole my line when I read Fairways' post. He is the guy daydreamJerry String-3/4/1998
1695 Please, Fonix in Bill Gates doorway? Not even close.Brian Malloy-3/4/1998
1694 I think Fonix just got themselves in Bill Gates doorway (if they weren't alFairways9-3/4/1998
1693 Anyone else following this trail or am I day-dreaming too much?? Monday OctobeCareyM-3/4/1998
1692 Interestingly though, when it came to choosing an existing product to be the PCHunter Trout-3/3/1998
1691 Another major review of speech recognition (this time in PC Magazine) and stillWilliam Baker-3/3/1998
1690 Anybody on the thread from the Los Angeles?? AcuVoice demo at the LA ConventioCareyM-3/2/1998
1689 More news... Monday March 2, 10:02 am Eastern Time Company Press Release SOUCareyM-3/2/1998
1688 What do you Fonix folks think of the news that this woman is coming to your comdwight martin-2/27/1998
1687 Randall: My analogy to AOL follows: When AOL was around 30 or so, the mJinping Shi-2/27/1998
1686 COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: William Baker-2/26/1998
1685 Jinping, I don't quite follow you...you say .... <<Very nice and lonRandall E Westberg-2/24/1998
1684 Randall: Very nice and long post. It reminds me of the posts on AOL board aJinping Shi-2/23/1998
1683 <<Parx, paid handsomely to present this sentence.>> And how about tJerry String-2/22/1998
1682 Bob, I wish you the best. Your common sense approach will serve you well. I Fairways9-2/22/1998
1681 Thanks, Randy. You did a good job on the summary - better than I could have! Dr. Bob-2/22/1998
1680 Dr. White, thanks for the enlightenment. If anyone is really wondering why a veRandall E Westberg-2/22/1998
1679 Jerry, no you can't come back. Stay the *^&** away. Parx, paid handsomMark Cox-2/22/1998
1678 <<I was referring to the shorts negativity, somewhat closer to your own aJerry String-2/21/1998
1677 <<Jerry get of the thread unless you contribute something.>> The foJerry String-2/21/1998
1676 Thanks for your usual enlightening "you do the research approach". NoMark Cox-2/21/1998
1675 Jerry, Thanks for the kudos. However, I was not chased off this thread. In tDr. Bob-2/21/1998
1674 <<"shills" (what is that word?)>> Do you own a dictionaryJerry String-2/21/1998
1673 Dr Bob you will be much missed as a sober light to pull us "shills" (Mark Cox-2/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News