Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
17679	72	0	AMPX

Emcee: Gus	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
17004	Ha! I don't have time for meetings. I just drink alot'hic.	DennyKrane	-	2/23/2005
17003	Hi, I'm Dave, and I'm an Ampexaholic!	Dave Heibeck	-	2/23/2005
17002	The couch confessions should have started a long time ago for us old timers.	Paul Lee	-	2/22/2005
17001	<< As a consequence of the restatement, the Company also expects to report	Hal Campbell	-	2/22/2005
17000	I think you are correct Hal about the potential pension obligations numbers in t	chriscraft	-	2/22/2005
16999	This news explains something. In the Dutton Report, West's potential pension	Hal Campbell	-	2/22/2005
16998	No expert here SDI but, I think it is as simple as - Because they used rule no	digger	-	2/22/2005
16997	Can one of our pension experts interpret this release? I know most people cring	SanDiegoInvestor	-	2/22/2005
16996	What they giveth they taketh away Ampex to Restate Financial Statements to Appl	Paul Lee	-	2/22/2005
16995	We're drifting up on low volume. I'm guessing not many sellers, but no l	OPVet	-	2/22/2005
16994	I got you now, hey no sense waiting we only live once. Have a good one and and	chriscraft	-	2/21/2005
16993	The truth is, my petite wife would rather I bought a sedan, so I hope to strike	OPVet	-	2/21/2005
16992	Exactly correct 2.10/share pre split, I feel we have a long way to still go, and	chriscraft	-	2/21/2005
16991	Here's a good post by Killybillfisher in counterpoint to ITC risks, Opvet (I	Hal Campbell	-	2/21/2005
16990	Yeah, the possibilities excite me, but I'm not ordering my SUV just yet. I&#	OPVet	-	2/21/2005
16989	Killing a little time, I looked at the Dolby prospectus. The 39.8 million came o	Hal Campbell	-	2/21/2005
16988	Interesting, OpVet. Thanks! Gives us many clues about potential Ampex valuation	Hal Campbell	-	2/21/2005
16987	All the conjecture about viability of the patents is interesting, and sobering.	OPVet	-	2/21/2005
16986	<<This stock has gotten further ahead of itself than any other stock out t	Hal Campbell	-	2/21/2005
16985	"FOOLS ARE US - BUT NOT ME" If you are out, why are you here? This i	Dave Heibeck	-	2/20/2005
16984	FOOLS ARE US - BUT NOT ME On point 1 I am sure everyone can agree. Point 1) O	Buyerchoice	-	2/20/2005
16983	Charlie: "But there is still the risk that the Ampex patent could be ruled	Dave Heibeck	-	2/20/2005
16982	They will be parading several devices, Charlie. I don't think they are denyi	Hal Campbell	-	2/19/2005
16981	Tom, You sound like you're in denial. As I understand it, if the Quantel de	Amboy Charlie	-	2/19/2005
16980	KODAK Admits Infringement..... Almost! <<Kodak Company admits that its di	Thomas Kirwin	-	2/19/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):