SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
INNI-I/NET
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1856 9 0 INNI
Emcee:  majaman1978 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1706 Dick, great idea, except for the printing part: you don't need to buy... Francois Goelo-5/3/1999
1705 Dr. Yang, I may have to retract my last statement about GHS not owing IFS. In rdick west-5/2/1999
1704 Prof., I don't believe that GHS owns IFS. Both companies are separate entitdick west-5/1/1999
1703 dick, I got the impression that GHS owns the majority of IFS while INNI owns Yongzhi Yang-5/1/1999
1702 What has puzzled me most about I/Net's acquisition of CGG is why, the printdick west-5/1/1999
1701 Prof., from reading the PR, I believe that IFS's client owns the system. Ifdick west-5/1/1999
1700 I think we need to remember that IFS will also market the system to other banYongzhi Yang-5/1/1999
1699 JD, I realize that the P/E doesn't change after the reverse split. What doE.H.F.-4/30/1999
1698 Yes it do.....and only time will tell. dick west-4/30/1999
1697 This thread is starting to detach itself from reality. Looking at a number oveJohn Wilson-4/30/1999
1696 Correct.....Is the glass half full or half empty. dick west-4/30/1999
1695 whatever it is.......1M+ shares agreed with your math ;-)BishopsChild-4/30/1999
1694 Your right....I was rounding to make the division by 6 easier. Perhaps Dr. Yangdick west-4/30/1999
1693 Dick. From the article: we believe I/NET's revenues stemming from this prJohn Wilson-4/30/1999
1692 I said it was an assumption. And who said that the $6-7 million is over 5 yearsdick west-4/30/1999
1691 I'm not sure just how 31 + 16 = 48???? was 47 when I went to school. But IDilly-4/30/1999
1690 Dick. Close. You forgot to divide by 5. the 6mill is over 5 years! Where you hJohn Wilson-4/30/1999
1689 Mr. Wilson, I feel it incumbent to respond to you and Jerry's last posts. Adick west-4/30/1999
1688 Thanks Jerry. Point is no difference. The real trick is maintaining revenue groJohn Wilson-4/30/1999
1687 One cent quarterly earnings with a share price of $1 = 25 PE (1.00 /.04 -> pJD-4/30/1999
1686 John, I appreciate your insights. However, I don't understand why you are sE.H.F.-4/30/1999
1685 I knew it! $1 +....this was really good news...look at the volume...I expect ihcirteg-4/30/1999
1684 Dick, yes eps would change, we need an apples to apples comparison. INNI'sJohn Wilson-4/30/1999
1683 Dick- This is GREAT news...we will easily test $1 again today...probably highehcirteg-4/30/1999
1682 I presume you were referring to me, relative to your comment about "Revenudick west-4/30/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News