SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Francisco Gold - FGX.V
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1907 23 0 FGX
Emcee:  tom terry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1707Looks like FGX is solid at these prices....Glamis just put out a NR regarding thCeedee-2/25/2002
1706Yes, the fact that a stock is thinly traded adds a kind of leverage that can cutgold$10k-2/21/2002
1705It seems to me though, most of the time if any amount of shares where traded aFishfinder-2/21/2002
1704When you think about it the way VT puts it in a percentage it isn't so bad. TheBusDriver-2/21/2002
1703Scott, A .50 spread is less than 7%. A few months back on MOY, I was on both gold$10k-2/21/2002
1702Boy this stock is thinly traded. There is almost always at least a .50c + spreadFishfinder-2/21/2002
1701<<I'll check BAY over the next week.>> LIA & CC: Good stufTheBusDriver-2/21/2002
1700Geo, Hedging is not a bad word. Not at all. It make perfectly good sense to entClaude Cormier-2/20/2002
1699<20MM tons @ 6000 tons per day is almost 9 years of production if you assume Claude Cormier-2/20/2002
1698although 10 -15% NPV has been commonly used and remains in common use in feasibigeo in vancouver-2/20/2002
1697Claude, 20MM tons @ 6000 tons per day is almost 9 years of production if you asGeoDude-2/20/2002
1696<Maybe I should look at BAY next > Please do so. <On the NPV10 or 15Claude Cormier-2/20/2002
1695I think that we are in general agreement on the value of this stock although I&#GeoDude-2/20/2002
1694Merci mon ami... Good work. And I am not laughing.. pan toute. Here are my commClaude Cormier-2/20/2002
1693Claude, here is my economic assessment: Sauzal 20 MM tons @ 3g/t, 6000ton/day GeoDude-2/20/2002
1692I will. Give me a few days, my spreadsheet is on another computer. Long story ..GeoDude-2/16/2002
1691<b) there is still risk in this (technical, economic, POG and project financiClaude Cormier-2/16/2002
1690Claude, I think they are fairly valued given a) the big mine investment remainsGeoDude-2/15/2002
1689Russwinter, that's how I'm looking at GBU as well. They will never get tElizabeth Andrews-2/15/2002
1688Yes, I'm long GBU. There's a bit more country risk but it is an ideal deElizabeth Andrews-2/15/2002
1687I'm sticking with FGX too, but I may add GBU. It's on my list for the carusswinter-2/15/2002
1686<Anyway, not from the drill hole results given by FGX. Need more data.> SClaude Cormier-2/15/2002
1685Hi Russ I took a look at GBU and gave them a call. They have resettlement issueFishfinder-2/15/2002
1684Good points. I don't think we know enough about the deposit to be able to saGeoDude-2/15/2002
1683Kind of the same low cost genre as FGX would be GBU. It's lagged in the rallrusswinter-2/15/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News