SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17104Well, that explains the late action on Friday. As usual, we are left in the darscrooge-3/21/2005
17103Ampex Licenses Digital Still Camera Patents To Olympus Monday March 21, 9:01 am Paul Lee-3/21/2005
17102For what it is worth, my opinion of the potential here. The reason I am hanging Hal Campbell-3/20/2005
17101So 10% for royalty settlements shouldn't be a problem.chriscraft-3/19/2005
17100Kodak has over a billion in cash, DP.Hal Campbell-3/19/2005
17099Thank you for your analysis, Count.Hal Campbell-3/19/2005
17098Rampex there are some very good deals today on airfare from coast to coast, I wochriscraft-3/19/2005
17097Kodak Smog Alert.... There's an old saying among lawyers..... When you haveCountbugula-3/19/2005
17096Kodak is hurting. Looks like they have to save money any way they can. I think tDennyKrane-3/18/2005
17095It is not easy to disagree with the logic that... ...Kodak should settle sooner Rampex-3/18/2005
17094That was some move today at the close and from what I understand there were a fechriscraft-3/18/2005
17093Now a delay would be slightly to their benefit, Doc. That might be it.Hal Campbell-3/18/2005
17092Hal, I'm not sure why Kodak is still fighting so hard. But I think it is a mDrD-3/18/2005
17091You're probably right, OpVet. Yeah I remember it well too. I attended that aHal Campbell-3/18/2005
17090Hal, I think it's called legal obfuscation. Throw up enough stuff and wOPVet-3/18/2005
17089Thanks Doctor D. Outstanding news ( and an outstanding fellow). Their other wHal Campbell-3/18/2005
17088BlockBuster Deposition by Eric Anderson in support of Ampex's effort to haveDrD-3/18/2005
17087Looks like cash might be a little tight! biz.yahoo.com "Kodak Takes AnothDennyKrane-3/18/2005
17086Chris and Tom... as you have said Tom,for Kodak to settle somebody is gonna havHal Campbell-3/18/2005
17085Pay Now or Pay More Later.... Interesting that Kodak continues to fight - if thThomas Kirwin-3/17/2005
17084It sounds to me as if Kodak must have a real concern on their hands. Why go thrchriscraft-3/17/2005
17083Kodak continues to fight Anderson, and also to fight Ampex's motion to compeHal Campbell-3/17/2005
17082Final Four (and title) picks welcome. Anybody? Me, I'll take a flyer on IllHal Campbell-3/16/2005
17081We all know there have always been mysteries about Ampex stock. Still are. In myHal Campbell-3/16/2005
17080The question of whether the judge will allow Anderson to testify remains open. Hal Campbell-3/15/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News